Thread: Who gets the T?
View Single Post
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 04, 2003, 01:33am
Nevadaref Nevadaref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by mick
Yes, JR,
Last year's 10-3-3 is the same as this year's 10-3-2.
Last year's 10-3-2 went away



Ooh! I had a thought.
Even though last year's 10-3-2 is not there, is it really still there because it wasn't specifically eliminated? I need a ruling.

[/B]
And so it is written,and so it shall be!

R10-3-2 is gone,so a disqualified player is now not penalized further if they enter the game again. Just the head coach. And it's no longer considered a flagrant act.In other words,they've actually lightened the total penalty from a flagrant T and an indirect T to a single direct T.

Don't know if I agree
but that's the way it be. [/B][/QUOTE]

Glad I asked, because this is not what I understood the change to be, but then I haven't seen the new rules book yet. Perhaps someone who has it can post the entire section.
I was having a problem with the player getting a T and the coach getting a direct, but only charging a single team foul, maybe the NFHS deserves some credit for anticipating this problem.
Reply With Quote