View Single Post
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 24, 2018, 02:57pm
sdoebler sdoebler is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymond View Post
You said it was proper rule book terminology. It is not.

Don't get upset when you make a definitive statement and then get challenged.

Plenty of esteemed officials use "over-the-back" and "reaching". Doesn't make those phrases rule book terminology.
If you are going to split hairs I said it was proper terminology, not proper rule book terminology.

Based on the amount of clinicians and board members I have listened to use that "terminology" I deem it in the very least acceptable if not proper.
Reply With Quote