The interpretation is rather confusing and was not applied that way in the game in question. Instead of stating what exactly is done, the Casebook plays this game with situations where the game is over but a T is given with the score not tied.
This is a situation where the score was tied and it was not even clear when the T was given either (based on a article). It is not about not knowing, it is more trying to figure out if that is the way to do it properly and to see if others agreed. And honestly, I do not come here for your approval big shot.
I do not have to ever work with you or get your approval games. I was asking the same question that was asked on another conversation as there were people that debated what was to be done, which tends to happen in real life on or off this site.
I promised I would ask others for their interpretation instead of just going with what I felt and the reasoning because I had some doubt. It is kind of what you do as a veteran and someone that does not face every possible rules situation. This has never happened to me and frankly probably will never happen. I do not profess like you do to know every rule like the back of my hand or read in some 20-year interpretation for what is done at one time but might not apply to today. And considering how many times people discuss rules, it is always funny how someone like yourself will pull out some interpretation from the 90s and tell us how we have to apply to a situation that has no current literature on the topic. But hey, to each his own.
Also, 5.6.2 Situation C (a) was not the same situation that took place in the game. This was not a play with a contact near the end of the game, this was a blocked shot that clearly was not called a foul and a coach decided to go off and got ejected.
Peace