Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
Because he thinks that things that do not matter are credible. Why would this be any different?
Peace
|
Just thought it was a mildly amusing tweet. I wasn't suggesting he was an authority on officiating in general.
I'm not sure what you're referring to otherwise. I make suggestions or ask questions with a solid basis in logic. Most recently I cited Mike Periera, who I think we can all agree is qualified, to support one of my points.
I obviously have a different perspective on some things than a lot of the other posters here, but that doesn't make me some clueless idiot. I've demonstrated pretty clearly that I'm reasonably knowledgeable about the rules and more than capable of having a discussion about them.