Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymond
We have another rule that specifically says we can call a technical foul in this situation.
|
I can see your point except for the word "specifically". The rule (
10-4-5 A player shall not: Delay the game by acts such as: a. Preventing the ball from being made live promptly or from being put in play) is a
general rule, and
may not apply to this situation since there is another rule, a casebook play, and an annual interpretation, that cover this
specific situation, in a contradictory manner.
It is my contention that 10-4-5 covers situations like further delays after the resumption of play rule is put into effect, or when an immediate technical foul is warranted after a delay, free thrower refusing to move into semicircle, not after a timeout; or player intercepting the bounced ball from the lead official to the free thrower to request a timeout.
I have offered, on numerous occasions, a rule, a casebook play, and an annual interpretation, that
specifically cover this situation, that we warn first when a player delays the game by interfering with the ball, by slapping it away, following a goal. These three citations can't be more
specific, can't be more clear, and shouldn't be ignored, we warn first.
According to these three citations, it doesn't matter whether the player slaps the ball five feet, or fifty feet, we warn first (for delay of game), and if the team does it again we follow up with a team technical foul (for delay of game).
I would love to give an immediate technical foul to the player who slaps the ball into the twelfth row in the bleachers, but I have three citations regarding this
specific situation that tell me to warn first.