View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 29, 2017, 04:50am
Nevadaref Nevadaref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by todd66 View Post
That is what I told the official. He was adamant about the fact that he was right. I asked him if he was right then why was no one doing it that way and why had the state or federation not made it a POE to do it his way. Thanks for letting me know I am not losing my mind
Here is the NFHS clarification on this.
Actually published way back in the 2001-02 Comments on the Rules Revisions. It was longer ago than I thought. That was the year that the NFHS added the requirement that players must remain standing during a 30-second time-out.


REQUIREMENT TO STAND DURING 30-SECOND TIME-OUT (5-12-5):
To clarify and ensure consistent interpretation, during a 30-second time-out, players shall remain standing and on the floor in the vicinity of their team bench. Additional discussion reflected concerns about some states not enforcing the 'no cheerleaders' on the floor during a 30-second time-out and whether or not substitutes should be permitted to join the conference with the coach(es) and players. Because of instructions that may be given, the interpretation has been that team substitutes should be able to participate in the time-out meeting.
A reminder that teams must be prepared and leave the huddle when the 10-second warning signal is sounded.


*Note the warning signal was changed to 15 seconds prior to the end of the time-out period in the 2007-08 season.

Quote:
Originally Posted by todd66 View Post
Agreed. I stated the idea of that unless something is specifically stated as illegal then it was legal. How do you get someone that is so adamant about being right to see the light?
You can print the above passage from the NFHS.
You can strive to find an old NFHS Rules Book from 2001-02 and show it to him.
You can let him continue to do as he wishes and just ignore him.
Some might even ask the assignor not to put him with them in the future because this guy just won't listen to reason.
Reply With Quote