Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
it doesn't matter if A1 is straddling the line or has both feet in the BC -- either way, A1 is in the BC and the logic (or the NFHS-version of the logic) is the same.
|
I thought that the logic was that by straddling the line A1 is at the same time the last to touch in FC and first to touch in BC... hence the violation. In the play I've been discussing A1 has never touched the FC. I don't see how these two plays are being treated the same.
Now, in my play, if that's what the interp says then ok. But if we're saying my play is that way
because of that interp then I'm not convinced.