View Single Post
  #38 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 15, 2017, 12:17am
umpjim umpjim is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 769
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Yes, the runner is retouching 2B. No matter what anyone believes, the argument is valid. So is Steve's that this runner is still required to return and touch 1B to avoid an appeal for leaving early.

The point of me taking this route was to see how many would be so focused on the issue of missing 2B, they may overlook the point that to regain the proper order of touching the bases, the runner failed to complete the return to tough the initial base involved in the violation.
Which may be why BB espoused the "theory" of LTB. But they didn't think things through. Luckily, we have, in both codes, a rare occurrence.
Reply With Quote