Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich
We may simply not care.
As for case plays not in the current case book, I'm not one to care much about those either. If they were important, they'd be in the book or written into the rule.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
|
While they may not be important, that doesn't make them wrong and it certainly doesn't make the opposite true. If the opposite were true, don't you think there would have been a case somewhere along the lines to express the change in the ruling?