Quote:
Originally Posted by Manny A
But isn’t that just a follow-on to the premise that a play was made on another runner? In other words, once a subsequent play is made on another runner, the obstructed runner is no longer protected should she leave her base?
I don’t read that statement as applying all the time. If it did, it would be a separate and distinct exception under 9.4.3.
|
Thats the way I read it also. Its a follow up to the statement about there being a subsequent play on a different runner. If those requirements are met, then the runner is no longer protected if they leave the base.