Quote:
Originally Posted by jmkupka
FWIW, NCAA has the exact same verbiage in spelling out the exception, followed by this sentence:
The obstructed runner is no longer protected if she leaves the base.
|
But isn’t that just a follow-on to the premise that a play was made on another runner? In other words, once a subsequent play is made on another runner, the obstructed runner is no longer protected should she leave her base?
I don’t read that statement as applying all the time. If it did, it would be a separate and distinct exception under 9.4.3.