[BryanV21]

Originally Posted by crosscountry55

i'm sort of with you. I get the intent, but i think the language in the new rule needs to clarify how the throw-in exception is expanded by it. Right now that's not clear, so all we have is an interpretation that's not well supported.

I wouldn't be terribly upset if this rule got adopted by nfhs. First to touch, last to touch can sometimes be a tough and contentious thing to officiate. It would be easier in my head to think, "deflection? Ok, let's see where pc gets reestablished and go from there."



sent from my iphone using tapatalk

+1