View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 28, 2003, 09:09pm
IRISHMAFIA IRISHMAFIA is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by Bluefoot
When F2 stated that he blocked the plate, I understood it to mean that he knew that R1 had not touched the plate. F2 also knew that he had not tagged R1 out. F2 looked for R1 to tag him, but R1 was already beyond fence. (The distance from home plate to the backstop/dugouts is the shortest of all of the fields I work, thus R1 was in dugout immediately) So I improperly called R1 out for leaving the field of play, since F2 could no longer tag him out, when I should have called him out based on F2's verbal "appeal". Thanks for the feedback.

I don't think players know nor understand the difference between proper live and dead ball appeals. I myself did not about it until I became an umpire and read the book. Are we ever supposed to provide any instruction or help to a team when it is making an improper appeal?
No, but that doesn't mean the following conversation cannot take place:

F2 states "I blocked the plate!"
Ump: That you did and legally.
F2: But he has to touch the plate.
Ump: Okay, what are you saying?
F2: He never touched the plate.
Ump: Close enough, runner is out for missing home base.

Okay, so it may not happen exactly like that, but you get the point.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote