Lol...Actually I am referring to you in one instance. It seems like you werent clear on it either since you answered this post,
'ok..I will try one more. On a dropped third strike the catcher is about to pick up the loose ball and the batter's follow through knocks the ball away from her as she is about to pick up the ball'
this way,
'Don't know how many times it can be repeated. The batter is permitted to swing at the ball and in most cases there is a follow-through associated with that swing. Unless you observe the batter do something out of the norm with that follow through, there is no violation'.
Now you post this,
'Now you seem to want to apply this to interference with a U3K or hitting a live ball a second time.
Not the same thing though in 2006 I did propose a rule change to make interfering with a U3K to an intentional act for the BR to be ruled out. I sure picked the wrong year to do that'.
This is one of the contradictions we are talking about...Which is it? If the batter knocks the uncaught 3rd strike ball away from the catcher with a normal follow through, is it interference or not?
Last edited by bigwally; Tue Jul 04, 2017 at 09:57pm.
|