Quote:
Originally posted by STEVED21
Guys,
I didn't start this post to get opinions on this subject. I think we all can agree that PSK should apply given the rationale the NFHS used in creating it. It appears that the NFHS and each state association is using varying interps as to how it applies to the double foul sitch.
The rule book itself does not necessarily support the double foul concept.
|
I agree completely with you. It seems like they have an intent for the rule, but are trying to cover all the bases without actually covering all the bases. Or better yet, creating more problems with their rulings or interpretations. And still, no one has giving me the rule citing that does not make this a PSK situation, other than the fact that "my state says....." A smart coach will want to decline the penalty and just take the penalty as long as they get the ball in many of these situations. It is going to be hard to say to him, "PSK does not apply, because you cannot decline K's penalty." Especially when PSK is designed for R to get the ball with "clean hands."
Peace