Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve
Yes ............
as long as you judge the "swing" was an attempt to hit the ball. A "swing" that you judge to be an attempt to contact or interfere with the catcher is batter interference.
Rarely true, and you better be SURE, but I hate "absolutes" in rulings.
|
Intent is not required (at least not for NFHS; don't have the USA née ASA books available now). I'm not saying I would judge differently, just being a bit pedantic.