Quote:
Originally Posted by MD Longhorn
Someone please explain to me why we're inventing our own rulings that suit ones own personal sense of justice, when those rulings contradict a very specific and identical case play.
TPTB have told us very explicitly what they want called here. Why diverge?
|
I think the distinction is being made whether A1 has the ball. There seems to be a few points of possible violation here.
1. The ball is bouncing around.
2. A1 has the ball but the throw in has not started (ball is still dead).
3. A1 has the ball and the throw in has started (ball is live).
1 and 3 are obvious. 1 is a DOG, 3 is an immediate TF and a DOG warning.
The question is on 2, which is different than the case play quoted.