Quote:
Originally Posted by VaTerp
My thoughts from the couch:
I don't like that call coming from the L. I think he should have been more patient and gave the C first crack at that.
I think 2 shots should have been awarded.
He clearly signals 2 shots before putting the ball at the disposal of the FT shooter.
The C, who was obviously the calling official, looks like he's ready to start the clock after the 1st FT so he clearly knew it should have been 1-1. He must not have seen the L indicate 2. But again, its clear that the L did indicate 2 shots.
|
Agree. The L clearly indicated 2.
I find it interesting that the administering official, being the one who had primary coverage on the drive, thought it was 2. I think there is a good case for arguing that it should have been 2 all along. Perhaps he thought it was obviously a 2 and never say the lead indicate otherwise.