Quote:
Originally Posted by crosscountry55
1. Was the screen in the opponent's visual field, and did the screener give the opponent a normal step backwards?
|
Yes it was in his field of vision, all he had to do was turn his head. Regardless of this fact, he was given a step and took it and then the contact took place with a stationary screener.
Quote:
Originally Posted by crosscountry55
2. Was the screener's stance shoulder width apart?
|
Yes. He did not exaggerate his stance or set up in an unusual way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by crosscountry55
It's called an "illegal screen," not a "moving screen."
|
Agreed and if he did not give the proper time and distance, this would be a foul. This in my opinion was not a foul. And even if it was borderline I still would not want a foul called here.
Peace