|
Surprised by the amount of posters who either say this wasn't a foul or should have been passed on.
While I agree that if similar plays were passed on earlier in the game that this probably shouldn't be called, judged by itself, I ask the following:
1. Was the screen in the opponent's visual field, and did the screener give the opponent a normal step backwards?
2. Was the screener's stance shoulder width apart?
Answer these questions honestly and you don't even need to consider whether or not the screener was moving.
It's called an "illegal screen," not a "moving screen."
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|