![]() |
|
|||
|
Thanks for all the help so far.
Question 4: A substitute for Team S enters the substitution zone, and the second referee whistles to acknowledge a substitution request. The second referee then notices that the substitute has a tongue piercing. The second referee denies the substitution request and indicates to the first referee that Team S should be sanctioned with a delay. Is the second referee's action correct or incorrect? I said "incorrect" -- studs (an assumption on the tongue piercing) are allowed above the chin (also an assumption). The school has "correct." Wrong assumptions, or am I misunderstanding the rule? Edit: The next test I took had this question: After a substitute for Team S enters the substitution zone, the second referee notices that the substitute has a piercing post in her tongue. The second referee denies the substitution request and signals the first referee to assess a delay warning to Team S. No other team sanctions have been assessed to Team S in this set. Is the second referee's decision correct or incorrect? Here, the answer is "Incorrect" with a note that "A piercing post or stud worn above the chin is permitted. " So, unless I am mis-reading (entirely possible), the first question seems to be wrong. Last edited by bob jenkins; Mon Aug 12, 2024 at 03:56pm. |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Net violation (USAV and PAVO only)???? | kycat1 | Volleyball | 5 | Tue Mar 29, 2016 04:15pm |
| PAVO Refschool Practice Test | pavbref | Volleyball | 1 | Mon Aug 04, 2014 12:34pm |
| PAVO Refschool practice tests | pavbref | Volleyball | 10 | Sat Aug 18, 2012 12:00am |
| PAVO membership? | jkumpire | Volleyball | 1 | Tue Jul 26, 2011 02:43am |
| Are all ref's members of PAVO too? | OmniSpiker | Volleyball | 6 | Mon Nov 05, 2007 10:57am |