over the net call?

bbman

Player Blue on teams 3rd hit, hits the ball toward the top of net. Player White jumps up and spikes the ball down while its still entirely on Blue side. Is this legal/illegal?
Thanks in advance
Could you mention rule that would be sited?

bob jenkins

bbman wrote
Player Blue on teams 3rd hit, hits the ball toward the top of net. Player White jumps up and spikes the ball down while its still entirely on Blue side. Is this legal/illegal?
Thanks in advance
Could you mention rule that would be sited?

A block would be legal; an attack would be illegal.

9-6-3 and 9-6-4

In my mind's eye I see this as an attack based on your description.

Scrapper1

bob jenkins wrote
A block would be legal; an attack would be illegal.

9-6-3 and 9-6-4

In my mind's eye I see this as an attack based on your description.

Agreed

chapmaja

bob jenkins wrote
A block would be legal; an attack would be illegal.

9-6-3 and 9-6-4

In my mind's eye I see this as an attack based on your description.

Illegal attack (over the net) in my eyes as well.

FMadera

chapmaja wrote
Illegal attack (over the net) in my eyes as well.

Maybe nitpicky, but this would be technically "illegal reaching beyond the net." We don't generally want to call something an "illegal attack" when it doesn't involve a back row player (including libero finger setting in the attack zone).