Quote:
|
Quote:
I proposed a rule change to include "intent" on the BRs behalf. Only problem was I picked the year that they dumped most of the rest of the "intent" references. Did not even get the support of the umpire committee. Personally, I'm all for going back the original rule and the batter is out on strike three. End of story, no second chances. |
I was looking into the origins of the D3K rule awhile back, and I recall it stemmed from the days way back when F2 was positioned further back & every pitch was caught on the bounce.
That and the theory that every batter-batter/runner must be retired on either a tag or a catch (so that even a K involves a catch). |
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post Which reminds me, saw this play recently. R running from 1st, fly ball to RF, caught. F9 throws to 1st in time for the tag up out. Tag made, runner's slide carries her into F3, ball comes out when they fall. Out or safe. Quote:
The issue became whether control for the runner tag was sufficient or whether the fielder had to maintain control for the duration of the play (runner's slide carries her into F3, ball comes out when they fall). This was not a case of the fielder trying to throw, IOW not losing it on "the transfer". |
Quote:
Where it gets tricky is when the ball comes out of the hand or glove very shortly after the tag. If it happens nearly simultaneously, then you could judge that the fielder didn't securely hold the ball at the moment of the tag. But the bigger the gap in time between the tag and the drop, the more convincing it is to state the ball was securely held when the tag took place. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:11pm. |