The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Softball (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/)
-   -   Thoughts on a Look-Back Rule case (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/98000-thoughts-look-back-rule-case.html)

Dakota Mon Jun 02, 2014 09:48am

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 935285)
What intent would that be :confused:






;)

To create 10,000 complaints a season by coaches! :D

Dakota Mon Jun 02, 2014 09:51am

Quote:

Originally Posted by CecilOne (Post 935270)
I have always said the LBR is not a "gotcha" rule...

+1

Same for its conjoined twin... the leaving early rule.

MD Longhorn Mon Jun 02, 2014 09:53am

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmkupka (Post 935300)
That being said (Cecil's and Agr8's comments), my situation this weekend was, me in "C", R1 on 2B, her ready position had her rear foot on the bag.
In order to get a look at F2's signal, R1 leaned forward, bringing her rear foot waaay up off the bag, then back down. No early lead, no toying with F1.

What say you in that sit?

10U? Inform the coach that she can't do that.

Anything else, that's an out. They know better by then.

CecilOne Mon Jun 02, 2014 10:36am

Quote:

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn (Post 935307)
Anything else, that's an out. They know better by then.

"off the bag, then back down. No early lead, no toying with F1."
I disagree, but that's probably obvious.

IRISHMAFIA Mon Jun 02, 2014 07:57pm

IMO, there is no "leading" in softball.

KJUmp Mon Jun 02, 2014 08:59pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmkupka (Post 935300)
That being said (Cecil's and Agr8's comments), my situation this weekend was, me in "C", R1 on 2B, her ready position had her rear foot on the bag.
In order to get a look at F2's signal, R1 leaned forward, bringing her rear foot waaay up off the bag, then back down. No early lead, no toying with F1.

What say you in that sit?

Easy, I've got an OUT.
What was your call?

jmkupka Tue Jun 03, 2014 08:45am

By lead, of course I meant "no early leaving of the base to advance to 3B"

KJ, I made no call. Afterwards, that felt incorrect (hence the post).
As seen in this thread, I am able to rationalize, if not justify, my no-call.

MD Longhorn Tue Jun 03, 2014 08:49am

Quote:

Originally Posted by CecilOne (Post 935309)
"off the bag, then back down. No early lead, no toying with F1."
I disagree, but that's probably obvious.

How are you going to justify this no call when the coach comes out? I get not calling a player shuffling their feet. But stepping WAY off the base to look in - this is an elephant call you can't fail to make.

jmkupka Tue Jun 03, 2014 09:02am

Absolutely right MD,

actually, the base foot went way up, not forward, and went straight back down. But, yes the front foot was indeed stretched 2+ feet toward 3B.

I'm sure it would have been just as illegal if she used the "front foot on the base" stance, then leaned back to see the signal, bringing the front foot up off the bag.

CecilOne Tue Jun 03, 2014 09:18am

Quote:

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn (Post 935360)
How are you going to justify this no call when the coach comes out? I get not calling a player shuffling their feet. But stepping WAY off the base to look in - this is an elephant call you can't fail to make.

"foot went way up, not forward" That would fall under "gotcha".

And I try not to make calls based on what a coach thinks or just to avoid debate. :( If needed, I would explain to the coach that it is not the purpose or interpretation of the rule; then count him/her as a lost vote. :rolleyes:

CecilOne Tue Jun 03, 2014 09:19am

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 935335)
IMO, there is no "leading" in softball.

I guess it is time for my list of words that mean different things in games than the dictionary.

MD Longhorn Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:25am

Quote:

Originally Posted by CecilOne (Post 935365)
And I try not to make calls based on what a coach thinks or just to avoid debate. :(

Ok, I agree with that.

So what do you say when the coach PROTESTS after you describe what you saw and why you then ruled what you did anyway.

The rule gives us leeway in most "gotcha!" cases in that we alone determine what "immediately" means. There's no leeway on this one though.

youngump Tue Jun 03, 2014 01:11pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn (Post 935371)
Ok, I agree with that.

So what do you say when the coach PROTESTS after you describe what you saw and why you then ruled what you did anyway.

The rule gives us leeway in most "gotcha!" cases in that we alone determine what "immediately" means. There's no leeway on this one though.

I've made this point before to a chilly reception. But here's how I see it: If the pitcher was ready to pitch then this is a leaving early situation and that rule states that the player must maintain contact with the base. Get the out.

If the pitcher was not ready to pitch then this is a lookback rule situation. The player did not "leave" the base if her foot was straight above it, she just didn't maintain contact with it. Do not call her out.

Manny A Tue Jun 03, 2014 02:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by youngump (Post 935386)
The player did not "leave" the base if her foot was straight above it....

:eek:

youngump Tue Jun 03, 2014 03:34pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manny A (Post 935393)
:eek:

Yeah, that was about the reaction before. Everybody else thinks they are ignoring a rule when they don't call a runner out for cleaning her cleats. I think it's the way the rule should be interpreted.
If leave means to lose contact with (as most everyone here thinks it does) then there is no way to avoid calling this out. I just don't see how that's a natural reading and the consequences of it don't make the game better.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:08pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1