The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Softball (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/)
-   -   Courtesy Runner Timing (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/96207-courtesy-runner-timing.html)

bwbuddy Thu Oct 03, 2013 10:03am

Courtesy Runner Timing
 
In NSA and High School (KY), can a courtesy runner be inserted for catcher or pitcher at any time while they are on base, or does it have to be done as soon as they first get on base?

RKBUmp Thu Oct 03, 2013 10:11am

There are no time restrictions in FED that limit the use of a courtesy runner. Browsing through the NSA rulebook I see no time restrictions in it either.

BretMan Thu Oct 03, 2013 10:15am

NSA 4-6: The player in the batting order where the last out was recorded or any player not currently in the game may replace the current (the player physically playing the position when the 3rd out was recorded) pitcher or catcher as a courtesy runner at any time.

NFHS 8-9-1: The team at bat may use a courtesy runner for the pitcher and/or the catcher at any time.

MD Longhorn Thu Oct 03, 2013 10:47am

A lot of teams will leave the catcher in until 2 outs occur (using the courtesy runner rule as it's meant to be used - to give them time to get the gear on and speed up the game).

IRISHMAFIA Thu Oct 03, 2013 11:34am

Quote:

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn (Post 906691)
A lot of teams will leave the catcher in until 2 outs occur (using the courtesy runner rule as it's meant to be used - to give them time to get the gear on and speed up the game).

People act like a courtesy runner is something relatively new.

It was being used in the late '60s in HS baseball in my area for that reason.

nopachunts Thu Oct 03, 2013 12:18pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn (Post 906691)
A lot of teams will leave the catcher in until 2 outs occur (using the courtesy runner rule as it's meant to be used - to give them time to get the gear on and speed up the game).

I have done tournaments where a CR must be used for F2 if there are two outs. Speeds up the half-inning break.

Manny A Thu Oct 03, 2013 12:29pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn (Post 906691)
A lot of teams will leave the catcher in until 2 outs occur (using the courtesy runner rule as it's meant to be used - to give them time to get the gear on and speed up the game).

I disagree that the rule was meant to speed up the game. If that was the case, why have a courtesy runner for the pitcher? Besides, the one-minute-between-innings rule is enough of a speed-up rule, and it behooves the umpire to enforce it to keep the game moving.

I believe the courtesy runner rule was intended to give the two players who typically work the hardest on defense an opportunity to rest while their team is at bat. That's why there's no restriction to using one with less than two outs.

MD Longhorn Thu Oct 03, 2013 01:07pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by nopachunts (Post 906697)
I have done tournaments where a CR must be used for F2 if there are two outs. Speeds up the half-inning break.

Me too. I don't like forced CR's - had one protested once (yeah, that helped the speed up process); a speedy catcher (yeah, usually a contradiction there) was on third with 2 outs and the other team insisted she be swapped out. TD agreed, even though the only girl in the dugout who could CR was actually going to catch the next inning and was already dressed for it.

MD Longhorn Thu Oct 03, 2013 01:07pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manny A (Post 906700)
I disagree that the rule was meant to speed up the game. If that was the case, why have a courtesy runner for the pitcher? Besides, the one-minute-between-innings rule is enough of a speed-up rule, and it behooves the umpire to enforce it to keep the game moving.

I believe the courtesy runner rule was intended to give the two players who typically work the hardest on defense an opportunity to rest while their team is at bat. That's why there's no restriction to using one with less than two outs.

The catcher part was meant for speed up. The pitcher part not so much - it was for the reason you stated.

shipwreck Thu Oct 03, 2013 02:15pm

Doing a HS game Tuesday. No outs, no one on base. I look over and catcher standing in warm up circle with shin guards still on. As soon as current batter flew out, she immediately took them off. How can we get a triple play with no one on base? Dave

nopachunts Thu Oct 03, 2013 03:17pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by shipwreck (Post 906706)
Doing a HS game Tuesday. No outs, no one on base. I look over and catcher standing in warm up circle with shin guards still on. As soon as current batter flew out, she immediately took them off. How can we get a triple play with no one on base? Dave

Habits are hard to break.

IRISHMAFIA Thu Oct 03, 2013 07:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manny A (Post 906700)
I disagree that the rule was meant to speed up the game. If that was the case, why have a courtesy runner for the pitcher? Besides, the one-minute-between-innings rule is enough of a speed-up rule, and it behooves the umpire to enforce it to keep the game moving.

I believe the courtesy runner rule was intended to give the two players who typically work the hardest on defense an opportunity to rest while their team is at bat. That's why there's no restriction to using one with less than two outs.

I believe it was originally meant as a speed up. Once they realized they could get away with changing the game, the Charlie Finley's of youth ball decided to protect their pitcher. :D

CecilOne Fri Oct 04, 2013 11:02am

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 906716)
I believe it was originally meant as a speed up. Once they realized they could get away with changing the game, the Charlie Finley's of youth ball decided to protect their pitcher. :D

Yeah, it's about time MLB did the same. :)

ASA/NYSSOBLUE Sat Oct 05, 2013 11:37am

Quote:

Originally Posted by CecilOne (Post 906760)
Yeah, it's about time MLB did the same. :)


Considering the amount of money invested in pitchers, it is surprising that they haven't done something like that. Steinbrenner went to his grave moaning about Chen-Ming Wang almost getting his career ruined by a base running injury in 2007.

IRISHMAFIA Sat Oct 05, 2013 01:18pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASA/NYSSOBLUE (Post 906816)
Considering the amount of money invested in pitchers, it is surprising that they haven't done something like that. Steinbrenner went to his grave moaning about Chen-Ming Wang almost getting his career ruined by a base running injury in 2007.

Then maybe he should have insured that he was paying for a baseball player.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1