The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 15, 2003, 01:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by CecilOne
But doesn't the runner have the obligation or responsibility to avoid the collision, even if it is not interference? As in "slide, go around, jump over, etc."?
Only if the conditions which allow the C to be there are met.

Other than that, I'm trying to visualize this play. If F4 threw from her normal position on the field and the ball hit the runner as she was touching the plate, the C must have already missed the ball UNLESS she was behind the runner's basepath. Then again, it sounds as if the C has no knowledge or experience in receiving a throw at the plate.

I believe this was probably a good "no call".
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1