The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Softball (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/)
-   -   Just Curious (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/92075-just-curious.html)

DeputyUICHousto Thu Jul 19, 2012 07:46am

Just Curious
 
I was just curious where some umpires come up with their own rules. For instance; allowing a runner to stand in foul territory and not in contact with the base for a right handed batter. I'm all for safety in the game but within the rules.

Has any else seen any silly "allowances" by "umpires".

RadioBlue Thu Jul 19, 2012 07:54am

Not in any of my games ... unless you count "ghost" runners. That's legal ... right? :D

HugoTafurst Thu Jul 19, 2012 09:01am

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeputyUICHousto (Post 849478)
I was just curious where some umpires come up with their own rules. For instance; allowing a runner to stand in foul territory and not in contact with the base for a right handed batter. I'm all for safety in the game but within the rules.

Has any else seen any silly "allowances" by "umpires".

Never heard of that one.
Don't even understand it.

RKBUmp Thu Jul 19, 2012 09:41am

I havent seen any to the extent you mentioned, but have seen some umpires that appear to make up their own rules regarding where the warm up circles can and cant be, anyone being even remotely close to the opening of the dugout and on dugouts with only a waist high fence have seen umpires tell the players they could not be at the fence.

Andy Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:42am

The "safety" is big in slowpitch around here.

It's even in the league rules in two of the leagues I work. A runner on third can stand in foul territory with a right handed batter up to avoid a potential line drive down the third base line. When the ball is put in play, the runner must touch third before advancing.

In my observations, I have seen far more runners using "safety" be hit or almost hit by batted foul balls than they would have been if they just stayed on third.

Dakota Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:45am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy (Post 849489)
The "safety" is big in slowpitch around here.

It's even in the league rules in two of the leagues I work. A runner on third can stand in foul territory with a right handed batter up to avoid a potential line drive down the third base line. When the ball is put in play, the runner must touch third before advancing.

In my observations, I have seen far more runners using "safety" be hit or almost hit by batted foul balls than they would have been if they just stayed on third.

Yeah, that idea only works when line drives in foul territory are banned! :rolleyes:

jwwashburn Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:56am

A runner not in contact with the base concerned about "safety"?

Wouldn't he be safer on the bench after I call him out?

IRISHMAFIA Thu Jul 19, 2012 12:21pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy (Post 849489)
The "safety" is big in slowpitch around here.

It's even in the league rules in two of the leagues I work. A runner on third can stand in foul territory with a right handed batter up to avoid a potential line drive down the third base line. When the ball is put in play, the runner must touch third before advancing.

In my observations, I have seen far more runners using "safety" be hit or almost hit by batted foul balls than they would have been if they just stayed on third.

It's a load of ****. Players get away with it because the umpire cannot watch everything. Then they come to Championship Play and, oops! "what do you mean I'm out?"

It's even difficult for a BU to see it from his/her position. However, put an umpire on 3rd and what else does s/he have to look at other than the runner on 3B? And there it is, "what do you mean I'm out? We do this all the time in league!"

The "but my guy hits the line" is weak. Why? Because it is YOUR guy! Got a fear of getting hit? Tell YOUR guy not to hit it there.

However, with the condition of the game with today's pretenders, I predict a proposal in the next couple of years to place a double-base at 3B expressly for the purpose of protecting the runner on 3B. Which, I might add ill provide a slight advantage to the offense.

jwwashburn Thu Jul 19, 2012 12:37pm

This discussion is another reason why, in many cases, calling slow pitch is such a pain.

umpirebob71 Thu Jul 19, 2012 01:35pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwwashburn (Post 849509)
This discussion is another reason why, in many cases, calling slow pitch is such a pain.

Which is why I haven't worked an "adult" (and I use the term loosely) slow pitch game in two years, and I don't care if I ever work another. The actual children in fast pitch are much easier to deal with.

jwwashburn Thu Jul 19, 2012 01:39pm

+1000

Rich Ives Thu Jul 19, 2012 03:19pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwwashburn (Post 849498)
A runner not in contact with the base concerned about "safety"?

Wouldn't he be safer on the bench after I call him out?

Is the softball rule different? In BB you aren't out if hit by a batted ball over foul ground.

jwwashburn Thu Jul 19, 2012 03:20pm

I did not mention a foul ball hitting him and calling him out. That rule is the same in both sports.

I would call him out because he is not on the base at the time of the pitch.

HugoTafurst Thu Jul 19, 2012 04:22pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich Ives (Post 849524)
Is the softball rule different? In BB you aren't out if hit by a batted ball over foul ground.

That part of the rule is not different, but beilng off the bag before the pitch is way different

Rich Ives Thu Jul 19, 2012 05:09pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by HugoTafurst (Post 849527)
That part of the rule is not different, but beilng off the bag before the pitch is way different

I thought the discussion had morphed to one about leagues that allow the runner to be off the base for safety.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1