The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Softball (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/)
-   -   Mechanics discussion (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/59907-mechanics-discussion.html)

tcannizzo Sun Dec 05, 2010 08:14am

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 704903)
<snip>I couldn't agree more, well, almost. My major concern is always that the play gets covered by the umpire who is supposed to cover it. Obviously, there are times an umpire needs help, but that should be the exception. That also means that the crew must be on the same page, or it just isn't going to be a good game for Blue.</snip>

IMHO, there is much room for improvement in defining situations where (and how) help should and should not be given, both solicited and unsolicited.

In particular, INT/OBS, a topic that is near and dear to my heart. :o

Sitch: Umpire who has primary responsibilty, either misses or simply does not call INT/OBS; but partner does.

What is the best way for partner to handle this?
a.) Do nothing, unless help is solicited.
> While this approach preserves the integrity of the primary caller, it could become a difficult situation with coach who would ask, "Well, if you saw, it why didn't you call it, especially when a Dead Ball call is prescribed by rule?"

b.) Offer unsolicited help..If so, how should unsolcited help be offered?
> While this approach is an attempt to "get it right", it could create the perception that one umpire is overturning another umpire's call.

Just askin' :confused:

CecilOne Sun Dec 05, 2010 11:05am

I guess I'm a "call it if you see it" person, regardless of "primary area" for calls like INT, OBS, pitch hitting batter, UC; although will reverse if partner has a good reason. Of course, this does not apply to out/safe, catch/no-catch, etc.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1