The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Softball (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/)
-   -   I know it's been covered before, but I can't find the old thread (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/58808-i-know-its-been-covered-before-but-i-cant-find-old-thread.html)

SamG Sat Aug 07, 2010 06:08pm

I know it's been covered before, but I can't find the old thread
 
NSA Rules

R1 on 3rd, no outs.

Ball 4. Catcher returns ball to pitcher in circle. BR runs to 1st, rounds it, goes three steps off (toward 2nd), then stops, and goes back to 1st.

Defense goes nuts and says the pitcher got back on the rubber before BR reached 1st.

Offense makes two claims
1) Pitcher held the ball up to "threaten" a throw
2) BR is entitled to round, stop, and return to 1st as long as it's an immediate stop & return.

Ball WAS in the circle in pitcher's possession when BR touched 1st. I do not know if pitcher was on the rubber.

This is U12, not that it makes a difference but that's why this play is still being used.

I *THINK* under both offensive claims, BR becomes R2 on 1st. Am I correct? Does it make a difference if the pitcher is on the rubber before BR reaches 1st?

Thanks

I do know (or think I do) if offense claim #1 is true, LBR is off.

SC Ump Sat Aug 07, 2010 07:51pm

BR rounds first then stops and goes back - One stop is allowed and, if the pitcher has the ball in the circle and is not making a play, the BR must then commit to either go back to first or continue on to second. This is not an infraction.

Defense goes nuts... - They often do.

Offense makes two claims... - They shouldn't have been in the discussion. It sounds like better game control could have been in place.

I do not know if pitcher was on the rubber. - It only matters if the pitcher is in the circle. The pitching plate has nothing to do with the lookback rule. (Baseball has rubbers; softball has pitching plates.)

SamG Sun Aug 08, 2010 07:29am

Thanks. That's what I thought.

Defense complained. BU & PU got together, then called BR out.

CecilOne Sun Aug 08, 2010 04:15pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SamG (Post 688095)
Thanks. That's what I thought.

Defense complained. BU & PU got together, then called BR out.

:eek: :eek: :o

txtrooper Wed Aug 11, 2010 05:50pm

Speaking ASA, on a walk, if the runner rounds first, commits to second (Umpires Judgement on the 3 steps) and stops, while the pitcher has control of the ball in the circle, its a LBR violation and an out. Although, when the pitcher makes a fake throw, it is considered making a play, no out.

argodad Wed Aug 11, 2010 06:28pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by txtrooper (Post 688495)
Speaking ASA, on a walk, if the runner rounds first, commits to second (Umpires Judgement on the 3 steps) and stops, while the pitcher has control of the ball in the circle, its a LBR violation and an out. Although, when the pitcher makes a fake throw, it is considered making a play, no out.

Disagree, Trooper. Runner can round, stop once, then go to 2B or return to 1B. In no case does "committing to second" come into play until after the legal stop.

txtrooper Wed Aug 11, 2010 07:13pm

ASA Rule 8, Sec 7, T3 (Look Back Rule) allows the runner to stop in every case? The umpire manual makes reference to and uses the term non-stop within this rule. Our umpire crew and UIC all call it the way I described in the OP. The way you explained it leads me to believe that the runner could run right up to second, stop and then commit to a base (1st or 2nd) without it being a LBR violation?

IRISHMAFIA Wed Aug 11, 2010 07:34pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by txtrooper (Post 688503)
ASA Rule 8, Sec 7, T3 (Look Back Rule) allows the runner to stop in every case? The umpire manual makes reference to and uses the term non-stop within this rule. Our umpire crew and UIC all call it the way I described in the OP. The way you explained it leads me to believe that the runner could run right up to second, stop and then commit to a base (1st or 2nd) without it being a LBR violation?

8.7.T.3.a: The batter-runner who rounds first base toward second base may stop once, but then must immediately non-stop return to first base or attempt to adance non-stop to second base.

To me, the rule is quite clear and always has been. The runner is allowed one stop and then must proceed non-stop to one base or the other.

Dakota Wed Aug 11, 2010 08:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by txtrooper (Post 688495)
... (Umpires Judgement on the 3 steps) ...

:confused::confused::confused:

BretMan Wed Aug 11, 2010 10:01pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dakota (Post 688507)
:confused::confused::confused:

Yeah, the "three steps" thing had be confused too. I thought that he was implying a runner had to take a certain number of steps toward second to qualify as "an attempt".

But I went back and read the first post and it has a reference to the runner having taken "three steps" past first base.

CecilOne Thu Aug 12, 2010 09:05am

Quote:

Originally Posted by txtrooper (Post 688495)
Speaking ASA, on a walk, if the runner rounds first, commits to second (Umpires Judgement on the 3 steps) and stops, while the pitcher has control of the ball in the circle, its a LBR violation and an out. Although, when the pitcher makes a fake throw, it is considered making a play, no out.

Are you confusing rounding with overrunning?

robbie Thu Aug 12, 2010 09:22am

Quote:

Originally Posted by txtrooper (Post 688503)
ASA Rule 8, Sec 7, T3 (Look Back Rule) allows the runner to stop in every case? The umpire manual makes reference to and uses the term non-stop within this rule. Our umpire crew and UIC all call it the way I described in the OP. The way you explained it leads me to believe that the runner could run right up to second, stop and then commit to a base (1st or 2nd) without it being a LBR violation?

Correct.

This is ehe example I often use to illustrate the point of allowing the stop.

MD Longhorn Thu Aug 12, 2010 09:50am

Quote:

Originally Posted by SamG (Post 688076)
NSA Rules

R1 on 3rd, no outs.

Ball 4. Catcher returns ball to pitcher in circle. BR runs to 1st, rounds it, goes three steps off (toward 2nd), then stops, and goes back to 1st.

We have nothing so far... totally legal.

Quote:

Defense goes nuts and says the pitcher got back on the rubber before BR reached 1st.
Who is "defense"? Players/parents? Ignore. Coach? BRIEF statement that what runner did was legal ... did he ask for time before he came out? Did we grant it?

Quote:

Offense makes two claims
Why is the offense "claiming" anything? Siddown, coach, I got it.

Quote:

1) Pitcher held the ball up to "threaten" a throw
Umpire judgement as to whether it was enough to be "a play", but probably a play. LBR off. Offense reminding of this is irrelevant.
Quote:

2) BR is entitled to round, stop, and return to 1st as long as it's an immediate stop & return.
Thanks, coach, I know that.

Quote:

Ball WAS in the circle in pitcher's possession when BR touched 1st.
OK... but irrelevant.
Quote:

I do not know if pitcher was on the rubber.
Doesn't matter. Never matters. Don't care.

Runner safe, move on.

MD Longhorn Thu Aug 12, 2010 09:50am

Quote:

Originally Posted by SamG (Post 688095)
Thanks. That's what I thought.

Defense complained. BU & PU got together, then called BR out.

For what???? I protest.

MD Longhorn Thu Aug 12, 2010 09:53am

Quote:

Originally Posted by txtrooper (Post 688495)
Speaking ASA, on a walk, if the runner rounds first, commits to second (Umpires Judgement on the 3 steps) and stops, while the pitcher has control of the ball in the circle, its a LBR violation and an out. Although, when the pitcher makes a fake throw, it is considered making a play, no out.

Oh no. Find us the rule that says "commits to second" after "three steps". Runner is allowed to continue running in one direction, however far she wants ... stop once, briefly ... decide which way to go, and THEN head to a base (to which she is NOW committed). BR can jog all the way to 1 step short of 2nd base, stop, and return legally.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1