![]() |
Dumbest question I've ever heard
|
Bad link.
|
Quote:
|
Link is working now.
|
Quote:
|
This post is a perfect look into the Beer League mentality:
"Softball is about offense baby defense is way over rated. " |
I wouldn't allow this because of the safety risk. I wouldn't allow a player to cut the toes off his shoes, either. Or the crot--you get the idea.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Their own damn fault if they get hurt. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The rules don't even require a glove. Besides, if the player is dumb enough to place themselves in harm's way, that is their problem. |
Quote:
That's like putting on metal cleats with no shoelaces. Have fun with that. |
Quote:
|
I've been umpiring ASA since 1978 and this is the FIRST I've ever heard of this. I might bring it up at our next association meeting to see if anyone else has ever heard of this. I think doing this would increase the possibility of injury to the fielder, esp is he is attempting a "shoestring" catch and ends up trapping the ball.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Jewelry..............
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Injuries...........
Quote:
I had one 3 years ago. We're playing and the storm clouds are moving in. I saw a bolt of lightning and got the players off the field. We're in a delay and one player comes up to me and says: "Are you an umpire or a f**king weatherman?" I looked him straight in the eyes and said: "I am an umpire who is responsible for YOUR safety and as long as lightning is in the area, WE ARE NOT PLAYING. I probably should have ejected him for that comment, but I didn't. We ended up getting rained out. |
Quote:
|
Jewelry..........
Quote:
Again, preventive umpiring. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This year's NFHS change will add to the confusion in other rules. :rolleyes: |
Quote:
With adults, I only make them remove that which is dangerous to others. They are legally responsible for their stupidity in that regard, and I would have minimal, if any liablility when they make an adult (albeit stupid) decision which affects only themselves. |
Quote:
The rule book (ASA) specifically states that I must believe the jewelry to be dangerous. I do not automatically consider jewelry dangerous because the person wearing it is under 18 yo. I also don't consider anything A PARENT allows a child to wear as dangerous since the parent did not. |
Parents...............
Quote:
|
Good judgment call, blue...........
Quote:
|
Quote:
But I'm not being paid to babysit. I would have to see them. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
BTW, in HS ball, the coach is also acting in loco parentis which makes them and the school responsible for the player and their well-being. That is why (for lack of a better term) get away with simply asking a coach is his team is properly equiped to cover much of the liability issue. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39pm. |