The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 12, 2009, 01:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCASAUmp View Post
Hey, guys,

This was brought up on another forum. Let's say that during the pre-game equipment inspection, the umpire looks at a Freak Plus and approves it for that game. Two innings later, a batter steps into the box, hits the ball, and reaches 1B. Before the next pitch, the DC brings it to the attention of the umpire that a non-approved bat was used.

Do you call the out, eject the runner and return runners? Or do you let play stand and toss the bat?

Either way, I suspect an @$$-chewing is in order, and rightfully so. Question is: who gets to do the chewing? OC or DC (later followed by UIC)?
Though the umpire's manual instructs the umpires to check the equipment, failure to do so or making an error in judgment at this point is not a matter of rule. I've always considered the inspection as much a courtesy and preventive umpiring as it is an assigned duty. When it comes right down to it, insuring all equipment used is legal and/or approved by the sanctioning body is the responsibility of the team and players. A piece of illegal/non-approved equipment being missed, overlooked or not presented for inspection does not magically make that piece of equipment legal for that game.

Now, if the umpire was specifically asked to check a particular bat and errored in judgment and told the player the bat's use was permissible, I could understand if the umpire ruled on the out, but did not eject the player using the non-approved bat. Any resistence from the coaches or players will make further action easy.

As a UIC, I would applaud your Solomonesque resolution to the problem. And then I would ask WTF you were thinking when you told the player s/he could use that bat!!!
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Non-approved bat list jmkupka Softball 15 Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:17am
Approved bats surehands Softball 10 Mon Apr 06, 2009 09:46am
New ASA non-approved bat list NCASAUmp Softball 4 Mon May 07, 2007 10:20pm
approved bats justmom Softball 13 Tue Apr 25, 2006 08:35pm
Non ASA Approved Bats Dukat Softball 0 Tue Jun 01, 2004 03:33pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1