Dave you are ejected.:D

Surround each statement you want to quote with the quote tags.

For example:

The above block of text will give you:

Thanks, Welpe.

Ron

No problem! I slightly edited my post, if that helps you any. :)

Oh noes! I wuz ejectid!

I can haz forfit?

Looking at the other issues in this video, what do you do (if anything) with the two base coaches and what looks to be half the dugout surrounding the plate?

I don't mind them being excited on an important score. As long as all players had helmets on, I'm not penalizing ... BUT I'm sure going to be alert for them to cause INT! :cool:

I got this from the Fed Interpreter for MA.

Ron:

I can't tell from the video exactly where the ball was when the runner clobbered the catcher.

If the catcher actually had the ball, the catcher is not guilty of obstruction but the runner is guilty of a malicious collision. She is out and should be ejected.

If the catcher did not have possession of the ball, the catcher is guilty of obstruction. However, when malicious contact occurs, it supersedes the obstruction and the runner is out and should be ejected.

How did you see it?

That I have already stated.

I like a good hockey game too, but the No Hitting League wants to protect its players...;)

Now you've switched states on me. I thought Maryland's Fed Judgment Interpreter was the man to see. Now you say Massachusetts. Do I need to book an additional flight or are they within reasonable driving distance of each other? Or, are they the same person? Please advise.

He's near DC and you know in that area, the only "truth" is whatever is needed to fit at the time. ;)

I'm sure Ron meant MD. But then again, you just never know.....:cool:

surprised to see this play still being discussed....

Yup, I meant MD. When I typed, I took a double take but kept it. Thought it was Maryland. Been a few years since I had to write MD.

I think it raised a bunch of emotions to see some poor high school girl getting plowed into without any repercussions.

It WAS a surprising play. I would LOVE to know what the PU was (or wasnt) thinking......