Hammer v. point on strike

[Dakota]

I've always favored the "hammer" v. the "point" on the strike signal, and not just because that is the mechanic I was taught (ASA, NFHS).

The "point" always seemed to be to be more show than effect, especially since it is typically a "turn and point", which with a one umpire game means the umpire takes his eyes off the playing field.

However, the Angels / CWS PU was apparently using a fairly complicated strike mechanic that included an arm extended plus a hammer. I didn't see the game; I'm only going on posted descriptions.

But, it has me wondering if maybe the baseball "point" mechanic is better for the strike signal, leaving the "hammer" for the actual out call.

It certainly would seem to have some advantage in the low pitch / strike 3 situation.