The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Softball (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/)
-   -   Interference call? (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/52540-interference-call.html)

wadeintothem Thu Mar 26, 2009 09:00am

Interference call?
 
ASA

The same idiot coach who I talked about in a previous thread "Rabbit Ears" http://forum.officiating.com/softbal...bbit-ears.html did the following and its been rattling around in my head every since. Even at the time... I just stood there staring at it ... half way about to call it but just not sure. When I'm not sure, I dont call it, especially if no one is whining. :D

R1 @ 3B on the pitch R1 Runs for home, coach runs beside with her for a few steps (3 or 4) then the coach and runner come to a "runner stop" and then he yells very loudly "get back get back get back" and waving his arms wildly... obviously the 12-13 y/o catcher is about to crap her pants and throws the ball to who knows where and the runner scores easily. Not a peep from anyone.

There is a specific coaches interference which this play does not fall within..

"Bush league" type deal, defense accountable or INT? Obviously, INT could be called.. should it be?

As I type it out.. it seems like a pretty obvious INT call. At the time though I was kind of incredulous at this jerk.

BuggBob Thu Mar 26, 2009 09:13am

Was this before or after the Rabbit ear incident?

wadeintothem Thu Mar 26, 2009 09:17am

It was after.

JEL Thu Mar 26, 2009 09:18am

4-7-C-2-a

Intentionally interfering with the play? or Wildly instructing runner to return?


I wouldn't call it.

youngump Thu Mar 26, 2009 09:41am

Quote:

Originally Posted by wadeintothem (Post 591537)
ASA

The same idiot coach who I talked about in a previous thread "Rabbit Ears" http://forum.officiating.com/softbal...bbit-ears.html did the following and its been rattling around in my head every since. Even at the time... I just stood there staring at it ... half way about to call it but just not sure. When I'm not sure, I dont call it, especially if no one is whining. :D

R1 @ 3B on the pitch R1 Runs for home, coach runs beside with her for a few steps (3 or 4) then the coach and runner come to a "runner stop" and then he yells very loudly "get back get back get back" and waving his arms wildly... obviously the 12-13 y/o catcher is about to crap her pants and throws the ball to who knows where and the runner scores easily. Not a peep from anyone.

There is a specific coaches interference which this play does not fall within..

"Bush league" type deal, defense accountable or INT? Obviously, INT could be called.. should it be?

As I type it out.. it seems like a pretty obvious INT call. At the time though I was kind of incredulous at this jerk.

I'm missing something. What did he do to interfere? You're upset because he ran with the runner or because of what he yelled? He yelled at his runner and the defense reacted badly. Did he cause them to react badly?
________
Live sex

wadeintothem Thu Mar 26, 2009 09:56am

Quote:

Originally Posted by youngump (Post 591545)
I'm missing something. What did he do to interfere? You're upset because he ran with the runner or because of what he yelled? He yelled at his runner and the defense reacted badly. Did he cause them to react badly?

I'm pretty sure I made no indication of being "upset". I said it was rattling around in my head, not that I was upset.

wadeintothem Thu Mar 26, 2009 09:57am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JEL (Post 591542)
4-7-C-2-a

Intentionally interfering with the play? or Wildly instructing runner to return?


I wouldn't call it.

My instinct is usually and was not to call it. This seems as to be on the defense... but the other Int thread got me wondering.

youngump Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:05am

Quote:

Originally Posted by wadeintothem (Post 591550)
I'm pretty sure I made no indication of being "upset". I said it was rattling around in my head, not that I was upset.

Sorry, didn't mean to misrepresent what you were saying. My question still stands that I don't get what you're saying he did wrong.
________
Pattaya Heights

wadeintothem Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:07am

Quote:

Originally Posted by youngump (Post 591554)
Sorry, didn't mean to misrepresent what you were saying. My question still stands that I don't get what you're saying he did wrong.

Thanks, I understood that you did not get it, and that is fine as well.

Dakota Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:10am

It's bush, but not interference. If he keeps trying that, in a couple of years he'll be pulling that big yellow softball out of his ear.

wadeintothem Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:11am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dakota (Post 591560)
It's bush, but not interference. If he keeps trying that, in a couple of years he'll be pulling that big yellow softball out of his ear.

I sure hope I'm there. :eek:

CajunNewBlue Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:50am

I had the almost exact thing happen last summer... (I didn't call it either.)
DC comes out and calls the OC bush and a few other words :eek:that I couldn't quite hear as DC had third base dugout. OC didn't do it again. :D
I talked with the UIC of the tourney and a few umpires about it and although we'd all love to call it INT and seatbelt a bush playing coach like this. We cant/shouldnt and it was explained like this to me.
"Players should know there own teams/coaches voices."
This was a ASA rule based tournament.

MichaelVA2000 Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:55am

A perfectly executed pitchout and snap throw down to third would probably take care of this situation.

Tru_in_Blu Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:58am

Quote:

Originally Posted by MichaelVA2000 (Post 591608)
A perfectly executed pitchout and snap throw down to third would probably take care of this situation.

Or a perfectly executed snap throw to the 3B Coach's ear. An it would still be a live ball until he kicked it or picked it up and threw it somewhere. :rolleyes:

Ted

IRISHMAFIA Thu Mar 26, 2009 12:34pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by MichaelVA2000 (Post 591608)
A perfectly executed pitchout and snap throw down to third would probably take care of this situation.

If this rattled the catcher to the point she couldn't simply hold the ball or throw it to her teammate, she isn't going to be able to execute something like this :D

Ref Ump Welsch Thu Mar 26, 2009 12:51pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dakota (Post 591560)
It's bush, but not interference. If he keeps trying that, in a couple of years he'll be pulling that big yellow softball out of his ear.

And he'd better hope there's a doctor there to help him, because most folks may not be so helpful! ;)

NCASAUmp Thu Mar 26, 2009 01:01pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by CajunNewBlue (Post 591604)
I had the almost exact thing happen last summer... (I didn't call it either.)
DC comes out and calls the OC bush and a few other words :eek:that I couldn't quite hear as DC had third base dugout. OC didn't do it again. :D
I talked with the UIC of the tourney and a few umpires about it and although we'd all love to call it INT and seatbelt a bush playing coach like this. We cant/shouldnt and it was explained like this to me.
"Players should know there own teams/coaches voices."
This was a ASA rule based tournament.

I call BS on this "players should know their own teams'/coaches' voices." Let's face it, some people sound the same. I'm also pretty good at doing impressions of various people (you should hear my Bill Clinton impression). If a offensive player or coach were to yell "I got it" while a fielder is attempting to catch a fly ball, you'd be a fool to say, "well, the fielder should know his/her teammates' voices." BS! Pull something like that, and I'll call INT, not to mention the probability that I might toss the offending vocalist for USC.

In this sitch, though... I can't call INT. Not because of the voice issue, but the coach is coaching his runner. Maybe it's HTBT, but from the OP, I just can't call it.

CajunNewBlue Thu Mar 26, 2009 01:18pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by NCASAUmp (Post 591638)
I call BS on this "players should know their own teams'/coaches' voices." Let's face it, some people sound the same. I'm also pretty good at doing impressions of various people (you should hear my Bill Clinton impression). If a offensive player or coach were to yell "I got it" while a fielder is attempting to catch a fly ball, you'd be a fool to say, "well, the fielder should know his/her teammates' voices." BS! Pull something like that, and I'll call INT, not to mention the probability that I might toss the offending vocalist for USC.

In this sitch, though... I can't call INT. Not because of the voice issue, but the coach is coaching his runner. Maybe it's HTBT, but from the OP, I just can't call it.

I agree... never would 'splain it like that either. I was just relaying what i was told.

BTW "Pull something like that, and I'll call INT, not to mention the probability that I might toss the offending vocalist for USC."
What about a fly foul ball in front of the O's dugout? and someone in the dugout yells "i got it" and fielder drops the catch?
What we doing then?

NCASAUmp Thu Mar 26, 2009 01:20pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by CajunNewBlue (Post 591645)
I agree... never would 'splain it like that either. I was just relaying what i was told.

BTW "Pull something like that, and I'll call INT, not to mention the probability that I might toss the offending vocalist for USC."
What about a fly foul ball in front of the O's dugout? and someone in the dugout yells "i got it" and fielder drops the catch?
What we doing then?

Tossing the coach if I can't find the offender. The coach is responsible for the conduct of his/her team.

IRISHMAFIA Thu Mar 26, 2009 02:00pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by CajunNewBlue (Post 591645)
I agree... never would 'splain it like that either. I was just relaying what i was told.

BTW "Pull something like that, and I'll call INT, not to mention the probability that I might toss the offending vocalist for USC."
What about a fly foul ball in front of the O's dugout? and someone in the dugout yells "i got it" and fielder drops the catch?
What we doing then?

I've had this at a men's major. More or less, at that level of play, you need to know with whom you are communicating and make the damn play.

What would happen if you, as the umpire in a 3-umpire system, went out on a ball and waved off the other BU and said, "I got it" and the OF let the ball drop? After all, you called it! :rolleyes:

Yes, you should say "2-umpire" or "2-man", but in the excitement, that isn't always what is said. I have heard, "Mine", "I got it", "My ball" among a few other things. I have not seen a fielder react, but could just imagine the conversation with the defense's coach :D

NCASAUmp Thu Mar 26, 2009 02:13pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 591655)
I've had this at a men's major. More or less, at that level of play, you need to know with whom you are communicating and make the damn play.

What would happen if you, as the umpire in a 3-umpire system, went out on a ball and waved off the other BU and said, "I got it" and the OF let the ball drop? After all, you called it! :rolleyes:

Yes, you should say "2-umpire" or "2-man", but in the excitement, that isn't always what is said. I have heard, "Mine", "I got it", "My ball" among a few other things. I have not seen a fielder react, but could just imagine the conversation with the defense's coach :D

Which is why they drill into us calling out something that should not confuse the defense. "2 man" or "one man" or "going" should not cause confusion.

If you deviate from that and cause confusion, you deserve the subsequent ***-chewing.

MichaelVA2000 Thu Mar 26, 2009 02:18pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 591622)
If this rattled the catcher to the point she couldn't simply hold the ball or throw it to her teammate, she isn't going to be able to execute something like this :D

Then it's time for the Dakota play:

Originally Posted by Dakota
It's bush, but not interference. If he keeps trying that, in a couple of years he'll be pulling that big yellow softball out of his ear.

MNBlue Thu Mar 26, 2009 03:08pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by MichaelVA2000 (Post 591608)
A perfectly executed pitchout and snap throw down to third would probably take care of this situation.

I agree, but I doubt many 12/13 yr olds would do this. Too bad in this case.

IRISHMAFIA Thu Mar 26, 2009 03:10pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by MichaelVA2000 (Post 591664)
Then it's time for the Dakota play:

Originally Posted by Dakota
It's bush, but not interference. If he keeps trying that, in a couple of years he'll be pulling that big yellow softball out of his ear.

Okay, let's take the next step.

If you have a catcher so terribly obvious that they are throwing the ball at the coach, would you ignore that?

If you do, where do you draw the line on retaliatory actions?

Dakota Thu Mar 26, 2009 03:18pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 591685)
If you have a catcher so terribly obvious that they are throwing the ball at the coach, would you ignore that?

I'd probably eject the F2 and laugh and the coach. And, send the runner back to 3B on general principle. ;)

On second thought, I might just draw the line on 12U and younger get a pass with jerk, bush league adults. :D

CajunNewBlue Thu Mar 26, 2009 03:46pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 591655)
What would happen if you, as the umpire in a 3-umpire system, went out on a ball and waved off the other BU and said, "I got it" and the OF let the ball drop? After all, you called it! :rolleyes: :D

I "sometimes" say ... "im going" most times i even raise an arm... sometimes i fergit :o ....partners should be looking for visual cues (my butt running to the outfield is a pretty good one) not so much the verbal ones.

PtotheB Thu Mar 26, 2009 04:38pm

I had a similar play on Tuesday. BR (who is a fellow umpires daughter and a heck of a player) launches one right down the 3B line. We're playing a HS game on a city field that had fences of about 350' so there's not really a chance of it leaving the park but either way it's going for a ride. I'm BU and cut in as soon as I see it leave the bat. After the BR rounds first I cut a look to my partner who is signalling fair and I run with her to make sure she touches all the bases. Almost as soon as she hit the runners lane the DC is screaming "FOUL BALL, FOUL BALL". He continued this until she touched the plate. The BR didn't even hesitate so I didn't want to rob her of her glory and kill it only to award her home. After the play I call time and have a quick "Come to Jesus" talk with the DC who saw the error of his ways. One of my points to him was that there are only four male voices on the field, two coaches and two umpires. If she had stopped or hesitated it would have left me no choice on a hit like that.

IRISHMAFIA Thu Mar 26, 2009 05:41pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by PtotheB (Post 591710)
I had a similar play on Tuesday. BR (who is a fellow umpires daughter and a heck of a player) launches one right down the 3B line. We're playing a HS game on a city field that had fences of about 350' so there's not really a chance of it leaving the park but either way it's going for a ride. I'm BU and cut in as soon as I see it leave the bat. After the BR rounds first I cut a look to my partner who is signalling fair and I run with her to make sure she touches all the bases. Almost as soon as she hit the runners lane the DC is screaming "FOUL BALL, FOUL BALL". He continued this until she touched the plate. The BR didn't even hesitate so I didn't want to rob her of her glory and kill it only to award her home. After the play I call time and have a quick "Come to Jesus" talk with the DC who saw the error of his ways. One of my points to him was that there are only four male voices on the field, two coaches and two umpires. If she had stopped or hesitated it would have left me no choice on a hit like that.

Okay, I understand where you would have went with this if necessary and would have made the same call. But how would you "rob her of her glory and kill it"? If anything, that would be obstruction, which is a delayed dead ball.

Even if she hesitated or stopped, you still are not going to kill the play until she is put out or all play is completed.

MichaelVA2000 Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:09pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 591685)
Okay, let's take the next step.

If you have a catcher so terribly obvious that they are throwing the ball at the coach, would you ignore that?

If you do, where do you draw the line on retaliatory actions?

If it's so terribly obvious that they are throwing the ball at the coach, I would not ignore it.

wadeintothem Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:07pm

Im pretty sure it would be accidental...

Ref Ump Welsch Fri Mar 27, 2009 09:45am

Quote:

Originally Posted by CajunNewBlue (Post 591696)
I "sometimes" say ... "im going" most times i even raise an arm... sometimes i fergit :o ....partners should be looking for visual cues (my butt running to the outfield is a pretty good one) not so much the verbal ones.

Ummm...I'm resisting making you the "butt" of a joke here! :D

CajunNewBlue Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:20am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ref Ump Welsch (Post 591865)
Ummm...I'm resisting making you the "butt" of a joke here! :D

And I appreciate that. :D


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:41am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1