The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Softball (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/)
-   -   Home Plate Tag - Safe (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/49091-home-plate-tag-safe.html)

ukumpire Thu Sep 25, 2008 05:46am

Home Plate Tag - Safe
 
Play - (all rather easy until...) Runner from 3rd comes into home whilst the catcher is receiving/in position with the ball all under control. Runner makes a perfectly good slide into home plate and gets tagged within an inch or 2 of the hp.
I take my usual second, or 2, before throwing an out, only to see that the slide of the runner into hp has removed the mitt with the ball inside from the catcher's hand.
With the whole movement still ongoing the runner slides across hp.
{when the mitt came off the catcher, she picks up the mitt with the ball still inside the web, which is lying right in front of her, and holds it in the air}

My Call - Safe, based on the 'lost control ruling'
The head coach calls time and discusses the play, insisting that when the tag was made, control was kept (I silently agree!) it was only when the catcher pulled her arm away after making the tag that the mitt came off the hand (I agree)
But then I let him know, that in my judgement and opionion, the movement of pulling the arm away is still part of the tag phrase and by losing the mitt control was not kept for the whole process of the tag!

If any of you are interested in the next part then all good & well:
Mike Candrea and Jessica Mendoza was watching the game and Mike is of the opinion that it should be ruled an Out!!

Look forward to your views on this rather unusual play!

IRISHMAFIA Thu Sep 25, 2008 07:37am

Quote:

Originally Posted by ukumpire (Post 539164)
Play - (all rather easy until...) Runner from 3rd comes into home whilst the catcher is receiving/in position with the ball all under control. Runner makes a perfectly good slide into home plate and gets tagged within an inch or 2 of the hp.
I take my usual second, or 2, before throwing an out, only to see that the slide of the runner into hp has removed the mitt with the ball inside from the catcher's hand.
With the whole movement still ongoing the runner slides across hp.
{when the mitt came off the catcher, she picks up the mitt with the ball still inside the web, which is lying right in front of her, and holds it in the air}

My Call - Safe, based on the 'lost control ruling'
The head coach calls time and discusses the play, insisting that when the tag was made, control was kept (I silently agree!) it was only when the catcher pulled her arm away after making the tag that the mitt came off the hand (I agree)
But then I let him know, that in my judgement and opionion, the movement of pulling the arm away is still part of the tag phrase and by losing the mitt control was not kept for the whole process of the tag!

Speaking ASA.

Spencer, we beat this to death sometime in the past year. Some still disagree, but the basic rule which I believe is supported by ASA's case book, is that if you (umpire) judge that the player controlled the ball at the time of the tag and then lost possession during subsequent play, the player should be ruled out. If during the application of the tag, the player loses control of the ball, then the runner has not been put out.

Many want to argue that it was not a voluntary release, so it cannot be an out. However, a voluntary release is NOT a requirement in establishing a tag.

Granted, this is a judgment call, but the standard you set for a tag is not the same as the ASA rule book. ISF did (and may still) have the wording that the player must maintain control immediately after the tagging action. Now the question is, define immediately. Is it a nanosecond, 2 seconds, 10 seconds, 2 minutes, etc.

If I could tell the catcher did not lose the ball until after establishing a tag, which in ASA only requires the ball to be securely held in the hand or glove while applying the tag, I would have ruled the runner out.

azbigdawg Thu Sep 25, 2008 07:43am

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 539173)
Speaking ASA.

Spencer, we beat this to death sometime in the past year. Some still disagree, but the basic rule which I believe is supported by ASA's case book, is that if you (umpire) judge that the player controlled the ball at the time of the tag and then lost possession during subsequent play, the player should be ruled out. If during the application of the tag, the player loses control of the ball, then the runner has not been put out.

Many want to argue that it was not a voluntary release, so it cannot be an out. However, a voluntary release is NOT a requirement in establishing a tag.

Granted, this is a judgment call, but the standard you set for a tag is not the same as the ASA rule book. ISF did (and may still) have the wording that the player must maintain control immediately after the tagging action. Now the question is, define immediately. Is it a nanosecond, 2 seconds, 10 seconds, 2 minutes, etc.

If I could tell the catcher did not lose the ball until after establishing a tag, which in ASA only requires the ball to be securely held in the hand or glove while applying the tag, I would have ruled the runner out.

What whitey said..... out!

CajunNewBlue Thu Sep 25, 2008 08:05am

I agree with the others... out. in the OP, to me the description of the pulling the hand away from the tag is a secondary movement and not part of the tag.
ie: had almost the same thing (except glove stayed on) when I asked her to show me the ball (tag was under the leg/buttocks area) the runner jerked/ spasmed (we know what she was doing...she was knocking the ball loose) ...lol and in my judgment caused the ball to fall out of the glove during the "show".

IRISHMAFIA Thu Sep 25, 2008 09:07am

Quote:

Originally Posted by azbigdawg (Post 539176)
What whitey said..... out!

You called me what? :D

Andy Thu Sep 25, 2008 09:18am

Quote:

Originally Posted by azbigdawg (Post 539176)
What whitey said..... out!

Quote:

Originally Posted by irishmafia
You called me what?


There's a story here that we're not getting....

Skahtboi Thu Sep 25, 2008 11:01am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy (Post 539198)
There's a story here that we're not getting....

Not real sure we want to, either. :rolleyes:

IRISHMAFIA Thu Sep 25, 2008 01:11pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy (Post 539198)
There's a story here that we're not getting....

Andy, don't start trouble. I know you saw the big grin.

It is a joke, funny ha ha. Actually, more sarcasm toward those who get so spastic about an innocent annotation.

We both know Darrell and no one in their right mind would intentionally anger him (especially since he can recognize me :D ). Then again, I'm sure there are plenty who don't think I'm in my right mind.....or my left mind, but that's another story.:o

Dutch Alex Thu Sep 25, 2008 01:56pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 539267)
... We both know Darrell and no one in their right mind would intentionally anger him ...

Than I can imagine that Darrel has the about the same size as Spencer. Spence and I were in Bulgaria 3 weeks ago. I know I don't want to (intentionally or not) anger him!!!

@Spencer: Have you seen Jack lately? Next time we meet, we can drink again to his health!!!

ukumpire Thu Sep 25, 2008 02:33pm

Jack
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dutch Alex (Post 539292)
Than I can imagine that Darrel has the about the same size as Spencer. Spence and I were in Bulgaria 3 weeks ago. I know I don't want to (intentionally or not) anger him!!!

@Spencer: Have you seen Jack lately? Next time we meet, we can drink again to his health!!!

It's almost the end of Jack's birthday and we are still together!!;)

Dutch Alex Thu Sep 25, 2008 05:50pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by ukumpire (Post 539303)
It's almost the end of Jack's birthday and we are still together!!;)

Help me remember that the next time we're assigned together I'll bring Jack and his buddy D. along...

wadeintothem Thu Sep 25, 2008 07:57pm

This sounds like an out to me, especially with your "silent agreements".

And I stood on the "safe" side the aforementioned beat to death of this issue.

Andy Fri Sep 26, 2008 09:25am

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA (Post 539267)
...We both know Darrell and no one in their right mind would intentionally anger him (especially since he can recognize me :D )....

You're right about that....if you can believe this, I'm actually a bit taller and heavier than Darrell.....maybe even a bit uglier.....:)

He and I went out on the field to do a 14u or 16u game together a few years ago - one of the coaches walks over to us, looks up and says....

"Wow, are you guys expecting trouble on this game????"

IRISHMAFIA Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:41am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy (Post 539475)
You're right about that....if you can believe this, I'm actually a bit taller and heavier than Darrell.....maybe even a bit uglier.....:)

He and I went out on the field to do a 14u or 16u game together a few years ago - one of the coaches walks over to us, looks up and says....

"Wow, are you guys expecting trouble on this game????"

Hopefully, you smiled and responded, "Not any more!" :D


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:44am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1