Obstruction ruling

[oppool]

This is a continuation of a discussion prestently on McGriffs and like to see some more opinions. It is the awarding of base or bases on a obstruction call. When awarding an advanced base from where the runner obtained without being put out what are your guidelines

If you think the runner had a possibility of making it to the next base but or not sure do you generally give the benifit of doubt to the obstructed runner or do you feel you have to be 100% sure the runner would of made it the advanced base without the obstruction to award the advanced base.

My feeling on this judgement in the past has always been that I wanted to feel at almost 100% to advance runner(s) on obstruction call that they would of made it if they had not been obstructed with

Gave me what you mentally use for judgement on this call

Replies our appreciated

Don