![]() |
Runner on base hit with batted ball
Bases loaded, batter hits fair gourndball down 3rd base line that hits runner standing on 3rd base.
1) Is runner out because runner loses protection of the base since runner is forced to move 2) Is runner safe because no matter what as long as runner is on the base the runner cannot be called out when hit by a batted ball 3) Is the ball dead upon hitting runner and, if so, what happens next? |
Quote:
I thought there was a thread about his exact issue not too long ago, but maybe it was on another board. If the runner did not intentionally mean to get hit (like stick his leg out and intentionally deflect the ball), then it's a dead ball situation, B/R is given/awarded 1B, and any runners forced are forced up a base. |
Bases loaded, batter hits fair gourndball down 3rd base line that hits runner standing on 3rd base.
1) Is runner out because runner loses protection of the base since runner is forced to move. No 2) Is runner safe because no matter what as long as runner is on the base the runner cannot be called out when hit by a batted ball. Maybe, could be out on intentional interference. 3) Is the ball dead upon hitting runner and, if so, what happens next? Maybe see RS 44 44. RUNNER HIT BY A FAIR BATTED BALL. A. While in Contact With the Base. A runner who is hit by a fair batted ball while in contact with the base should not be called out unless the act is intentional. The ball remains live, or becomes immediately dead, depending on the closest defensive player. When the closest defensive player is in front of the base that the runner is in contact with, the ball remains live. However, when the closest defensive player is behind the base, the ball is dead. Should the ball be ruled dead and the batter awarded a base hit, only runners forced to advance because the batter was placed on first base shall advance one base. Paul |
Quote:
In question #1 of this sitch, it's important to keep in mind that while they are "forced" to advance, the book does not really say WHEN they're forced to advance, ground ball or not. So all of the "no" answers that were posted are correct. |
Actual intent is required
Quote:
One more thing. The reason the rule supplement didn't state that the ball was dead due to interference is because that's not why its dead. Look at rule 8-1-E-6. It says "When a fair batted ball....touches a runner in contact with a base: EFFECT: The runner is not out. The ball is live or dead depending on the position of the fielder closest to the base." |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Thanks, guys, for your insight. It really helps my umpiring education.
|
Ok, so if there was no intentional interference (in ump's thinking) by runner on base and the fielder may have had a chance to make a play the ball is dead, batter awarded 1st, runners advance 1 base. If the ball hits the runner (still no intent) fielder had no chance on play (in ump's thinking) ball is live? What if the ball hits the runner (no interference) but causes ball to change direction enabling fielder to make a play somewhere. Seems the offense is penalized for something that was not intentional interference or is it tough luck? Or maybe I'm missing something?
By the way, thank you for letting me bounce these things off you. Plays come up sometimes that seem in the grey area and I know you guys have the answers, so thanks. |
Quote:
If contact with the FAIR batted ball was intentional regardless of the location of the defender, the runner is out for INT. If the umpire believes the action was an attempt to prevent a double play (and this play must be available), the R/BR who, in the umpire's judgement, would have been out had the INT not occurred is retired. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Not to nit pick...
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:30am. |