The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Softball (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/)
-   -   Patent Leather Belt (https://forum.officiating.com/softball/37631-patent-leather-belt.html)

MOofficial Sat Aug 18, 2007 04:13pm

Patent Leather Belt
 
Curious if there was a way to get them loosened up besides just the normal wear and bending of it? If there was something I could rub into the leather to loosen it up?

IRISHMAFIA Sun Aug 19, 2007 08:34am

Quote:

Originally Posted by MOofficial
Curious if there was a way to get them loosened up besides just the normal wear and bending of it? If there was something I could rub into the leather to loosen it up?

Man, now you've done it. :eek: I just as well start this off.

Couldn't tell you, I would never wear one on the field if I had one.

Next question is how quick will someone invoke the name of Emily Alexander ;)

AtlUmpSteve Sun Aug 19, 2007 09:42am

Without invoking any individual names, patent leather (either belt or shoes) is discouraged in all the higher levels of softball. Our goal is to blend, not stand out, and for our uniform to be, well, uniform (meaning the same as everyone else).

Dakota Sun Aug 19, 2007 10:03am

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve
Without invoking any individual names, patent leather (either belt or shoes) is discouraged in all the higher levels of softball...

Darn, and my Uncle Herb has given me his entire collection of patent leather belts, too. Wait, I can't use them anyway - they're white! :D

Hmmm... Maybe I could get a plaid plate coat....

Bassman Sun Aug 19, 2007 12:33pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dakota
Darn, and my Uncle Herb has given me his entire collection of patent leather belts, too. Wait, I can't use them anyway - they're white! :D

Hmmm... Maybe I could get a plaid plate coat....

Now you've gone and done it!!! Get this image out of my mind!! :D:D:D:D

justcallmeblue Sun Aug 19, 2007 04:18pm

do you have those fancy black and white leather patent wingtip shoes to go along with your Uncle's belt??? I put metal spikes on mine and wear then behind the plate :-)

bkbjones Sun Aug 19, 2007 04:37pm

Geeeeeeezzzz. Didn't I just talk about that patent leather crap?

In the name of Emily Alexander (there, I've done it), please don't step on a softball field wearing patent leather anything.

As for cleaning it...I dunno. Scrubbing Bubbles bathroom cleaner should work. Spray a lot on there and let it sit for three days in your oven at 200 degrees? Something like that.

Mountaineer Sun Aug 19, 2007 05:39pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve
Without invoking any individual names, patent leather (either belt or shoes) is discouraged in all the higher levels of softball. Our goal is to blend, not stand out, and for our uniform to be, well, uniform (meaning the same as everyone else).

Maybe cousin Eddie will give you a pair of his favorite shoes, Clark.

Skahtboi Mon Aug 20, 2007 12:42am

Quote:

Originally Posted by MOofficial
Curious if there was a way to get them loosened up besides just the normal wear and bending of it? If there was something I could rub into the leather to loosen it up?


If you can't tell by the tone that this thread has taken, you really need to dump the patent leather and go with a regular black belt. Then you won't need to worry about getting it "loosened up."

PtotheB Mon Aug 20, 2007 12:37pm

Curious if there was a way to get them loosened up besides just the normal wear and bending of it?

My suggestion is to run 4-5 miles a day for about three months. This simple act will magically make your belt grow a couple of inches.

Blu_IN Mon Aug 20, 2007 11:02pm

patent leather
 
Rediculous. Patent leather doesn't make you stand out. If anything, it looks sharp and professional. Honestly, the beef with patent is because some old guard won't accept new styles. Umpiring evolves, people need to learn to change with it or retire. At the very least, keep an open mind.

bkbjones Tue Aug 21, 2007 03:20am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blu_IN
Rediculous.

If you expect us to take you seriously, please either learn to spell or use spell check. Thank you.

And, no, no patent leather in softball. And when I do baseball, I won't:
*carry an indicator on the bases
*clean off any bases
*or clean off the pitcher's plate
*confuse "illegal pitch" and "balk"
*use the "hammer" for strikes or outs, and will instead use any damn mechanic I want for either one

I could go on...but don't come on here badmouthing softball and softball umpires when there is plenty wrong elsewhere.

IRISHMAFIA Tue Aug 21, 2007 06:40am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blu_IN
Rediculous. Patent leather doesn't make you stand out. If anything, it looks sharp and professional. Honestly, the beef with patent is because some old guard won't accept new styles. Umpiring evolves, people need to learn to change with it or retire. At the very least, keep an open mind.

So because a few who want to wear patent leather belts and shoes are simply "changing with the times", everyone else should follow suit or retire.

Great country, America!

Blu_IN Tue Aug 21, 2007 08:24am

re
 
So, those that want to change with the times, should not because the old fear change? That road goes both ways Irish.

BBK, you won't take me seriously because I misspell a word. Sorry if my time is valuable enough not to spell check my posts. Its a forum, not an important work memo/document.

tcblue13 Tue Aug 21, 2007 08:55am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blu_IN
So, those that want to change with the times, should not because the old fear change? That road goes both ways Irish.

Just try changing the music or worship style in church. The phenomenon became known as the worship wars during the 1990's and early 2000's

NCASAUmp Tue Aug 21, 2007 09:01am

I'm a guy, and I have no idea what patent leather looks like (except for maybe those lovely knee-high boots ladies wear). So basically, I don't know if they look good as a belt or not. Maybe they do, maybe they don't.

However, Blu_IN does point out that it does take a while for ASA to change the style. Think of how long we had those button-down shirts that looked like something from the 70s.

The answer, in my opinion, is that one proper uniform (minus any chest protectors, masks, etc.) costs around $150 (slacks, shirt, hat, belt and shoes). Many umpires, like myself, have more than one complete uniform (I've got 5 uniforms with two extra shirts that I took out of the rotation). Would we really want to have to keep changing the uniform once every couple of years? I know I certainly wouldn't, and that's why I take such good care of the ones I already have.

Blu_IN Tue Aug 21, 2007 09:24am

and
 
And I am not saying that you should either put on the patent or go away. Far from it, some people are not going to want to wear it due to their personal opinions. However, its really annoying that when it comes to conference tournament time, I have to hang up my patent leather plate shoes and belt simply because the old guard refuses to accept the style.

At least come up with something other than it stands out, or looks flashy. It doesn't. The NCAA uniform is so unbelievably bland. What in the world is wrong with wanting to show some style. What is wrong with wanting to look as good as possible? If I feel that patent leather plate shoes and belt make for a better look, what's wrong with that?

Dakota Tue Aug 21, 2007 09:25am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blu_IN
So, those that want to change with the times, should not because the old fear change? That road goes both ways Irish.

BBK, you won't take me seriously because I misspell a word. Sorry if my time is valuable enough not to spell check my posts. Its a forum, not an important work memo/document.

You mistake (intentionally?) standards for fear. I guess it suits you to call those who set the uniform standards for the various organizations cowards. Because ASA or whoever wants a certain look for their umpires does not make them fearful of change or anything else. It merely makes them an organization that sets the standards. Some standards on uniforms are written, others are encouraged / discouraged. Patent leather shoes and belts fall into the latter (unwritten & discouraged) category. You are, of course, free to wear whatever your locals allow.

You might get a more useful response if you posted your question on the baseball board, where patent leather is accepted, since many of those guys ape whatever it is the MLB guys do and call that individuality.

As to speeling, if you new how to speel you woodn't have too use a speel chekker.

Steve M Tue Aug 21, 2007 09:29am

I've managed to stay out of this one, but so much for that.

I wear the patent leather shoes in games where players do not wear metal spikes - they are easier to clean and my personal opinion is that they look better. I do not wear a patent leather belt - they are too thick.

As for the number of uniforms - that's irrelevant. I choose to work in a number of different sanctioning bodies. Each has their own uniform(s), and I have just about all of them. I pay my registration to each and buy the uniforms of each. Since I changed to a smaller vehicle a couple of months ago, I don't carry all the uniforms all the time now.

As for the music wars, we "fixed" that. We've got 2 separate services and seldom do they mix. Great fix, huh? But that does keep us from having to build a bigger sanctuary.

AtlUmpSteve Tue Aug 21, 2007 09:33am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blu_IN
And I am not saying that you should either put on the patent or go away. Far from it, some people are not going to want to wear it due to their personal opinions. However, its really annoying that when it comes to conference tournament time, I have to hang up my patent leather plate shoes and belt simply because the old guard refuses to accept the style.

At least come up with something other than it stands out, or looks flashy. It doesn't. The NCAA uniform is so unbelievably bland. What in the world is wrong with wanting to show some style. What is wrong with wanting to look as good as possible? If I feel that patent leather plate shoes and belt make for a better look, what's wrong with that?

Probably because "showing some style" and having "a better look" isn't UNIFORM with the other umpires. If it isn't the same, it is different; and that, my friend, means it stands out.

Further, patent leather isn't some new idea that the "old guard" refuses it accept. It is an old idea, developed in 1818, that has been rejected as inappropriate from the beginning of softball uniforms, and continues to be unacceptable. Not newly rejected; never accepted. Showing some style is the baseball non-uniform uniform. Just watch the LLWS for inspiration.

Dakota Tue Aug 21, 2007 09:37am

Quote:

Originally Posted by NCASAUmp
I'm a guy, and I have no idea what patent leather looks like ...

Here ya go...

http://www.tuxedosonline.com/images/...cko_BW_big.JPG

Steve M Tue Aug 21, 2007 09:39am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dakota


Yes, and they do reflect up.:D

Mountaineer Tue Aug 21, 2007 10:18am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve M
I've managed to stay out of this one, but so much for that.

I wear the patent leather shoes in games where players do not wear metal spikes - they are easier to clean and my personal opinion is that they look better. I do not wear a patent leather belt - they are too thick.

As for the number of uniforms - that's irrelevant. I choose to work in a number of different sanctioning bodies. Each has their own uniform(s), and I have just about all of them. I pay my registration to each and buy the uniforms of each. Since I changed to a smaller vehicle a couple of months ago, I don't carry all the uniforms all the time now.

As for the music wars, we "fixed" that. We've got 2 separate services and seldom do they mix. Great fix, huh? But that does keep us from having to build a bigger sanctuary.

I have both patent leather and regular. I wear the patent leather on dry days when the dust is dominant and the regular ones during rainy/muddy days. I agree that the patent leather is easier to clean - simply wipe off and they are shiny as new. Our college supervisor and HS interpreter allows patent leather so we wear them. I also wear a belt that matches the shoes. I know that if I were to go to an NCAA regional that I'd need to wear the non-patent leather plate shoes.

IRISHMAFIA Tue Aug 21, 2007 10:25am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blu_IN
So, those that want to change with the times, should not because the old fear change? That road goes both ways Irish.

Did someone just drop off a bale of straw? Ever hear of "majority rule"?

Blu_IN Tue Aug 21, 2007 10:26am

Uniformity
 
How do we lose uniformity by the plate umpire wearing patent leather? They are black, they are shined, they are as exactly as they should be. Patent leather belts. . . again black.

How exactly does that make us look out of uniform?

NCASAUmp Tue Aug 21, 2007 10:29am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blu_IN
How do we lose uniformity by the plate umpire wearing patent leather? They are black, they are shined, they are as exactly as they should be. Patent leather belts. . . again black.

How exactly does that make us look out of uniform?

Because to ASA, "uniform" is not only a noun, it's an adjective. :)

It's a preference issue, really. ASA doesn't want it, so I don't wear it. Could it spruce up an otherwise ugly uniform? Sure, but until ASA says it's okay...

We're at where we're at.

IRISHMAFIA Tue Aug 21, 2007 10:51am

Quote:

Originally Posted by NCASAUmp
I'm a guy, and I have no idea what patent leather looks like (except for maybe those lovely knee-high boots ladies wear). So basically, I don't know if they look good as a belt or not. Maybe they do, maybe they don't.

Many referred to them as "cheater" shoes especially in the military before synthetics like Corfam arrived on the scene.

Yes, they can look good and are easy to clean, but are not healthy for your feet. If you have a history of perspiring feet, you just as well wrap your feet in plastic bags.

The process includes treating the leather with a sealer much like the Leather Lustre many umpires use. And like the LL, the sealer will fill the pores of the leather and prevent it from breathing.

There are folks who don't want this type of apparel worn because it does bring attention to an individual umpire if all are not wearing the same thing. The problem is the perception of the teams that the umpire who is NOT wearing the bright, shiny uniform must not be a good umpire.

NCASAUmp Tue Aug 21, 2007 10:58am

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
Many referred to them as "cheater" shoes especially in the military before synthetics like Corfam arrived on the scene.

Yes, they can look good and are easy to clean, but are not healthy for your feet. If you have a history of perspiring feet, you just as well wrap your feet in plastic bags.

The process includes treating the leather with a sealer much like the Leather Lustre many umpires use. And like the LL, the sealer will fill the pores of the leather and prevent it from breathing.

There are folks who don't want this type of apparel worn because it does bring attention to an individual umpire if all are not wearing the same thing. The problem is the perception of the teams that the umpire who is NOT wearing the bright, shiny uniform must not be a good umpire.

Gotcha, but I believe the OP had to do more with the belt, not the shoes (though someone brought them up, and it's good for the discussion). Regardless, my answer remains the same: until ASA gives the nod to wear it, I don't wear it. Which actually reminds me of something else, but I'll bring that up in another thread.

AtlUmpSteve Tue Aug 21, 2007 11:02am

Quote:

Originally Posted by NCASAUmp
Because to ASA, "uniform" is not only a noun, it's an adjective. :)

It's a preference issue, really. ASA doesn't want it, so I don't wear it. Could it spruce up an otherwise ugly uniform? Sure, but until ASA says it's okay...

We're at where we're at.

I didn't say just ASA; I said at higher levels of softball.

Quote:

Originally Posted by NCAA Umpire Manual
The first step to being an umpire is looking like an umpire. Understanding the effect appearance has is vital. Appearance is probably more important in umpiring than in other things because in umpiring, at least most of the time, no one ever gets to know you as a person. They have little other criteria from which to make a judgment.

There is a saying in umpiring that you can never make a second, first impression.

If the first impression you give people is sloppy, disheveled or overly casual they will assume these character traits for you. That will then determine the degree of respect they afford you later on if they need to approach you.

On the other hand, if you look neat, clean and sharp, they will assume that this is how you will approach your umpiring and their approach to you will be more respectful.

It is important that you not only have the correct uniform but also that you wear it properly. Your uniform is the only thing in umpiring that you can always get 100 percent right. But you cannot get more than 100 percent. Uniform means alike, the same.

If you do something differently with your uniform–wear a patent leather belt or shoes, press your shirt differently–then you are no longer uniform, and instead of the 110 percent you hoped to achieve, you are now down to about 75 percent. The only reason most umpires to do something differently with their uniform is to draw attention to themselves–something umpires should never do.

Get your uniform to 100 percent. Clean and polished shoes, clean and unwrinkled shirt, clean and pressed pants, clean and blocked hat, and clean, uncracked and polished belt are the requisites of a uniform at 100 percent. Maintain it there. Then devote your energies to getting your umpiring as close to 100 percent as you can. A fine first impression means little if there is nothing of substance to back it up. Make a first impression last.

Okay, you think it looks better. You think it is easier to clean. We get that.

But, it isn't uniform, it isn't the same, it isn't what a top level softball umpire is supposed to wear. Not in ASA, not in NCAA, not in ISF. Don't know for a fact, but I am willing to bet it isn't approved for NPF, either. So far as I know, that pretty covers "top level" softball.

Blu_IN Tue Aug 21, 2007 11:02am

Pretty sure
 
Irish,

I am pretty sure they already don't expect the base umpire to be wearing patent leather plate shoes in order to match the plate umpire.

You say that this brings attention to the umpire whom isn't wearing patent leather by coaches and players. I would guess more often than not, the coaches and the players have no idea what the umpires are or are not wearing.

Most coaches have a hard enough time getting simple rules straight in their own minds, let alone sit there and discuss with their assistant the difference between belt styles worn by the base and plate umpire or that the base umpire really should be wearing patent leather base shoes if the plate umpire is wearing patent leather plate shoes.

NCASAUmp Tue Aug 21, 2007 11:07am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blu_IN
Irish,

I am pretty sure they already don't expect the base umpire to be wearing patent leather plate shoes in order to match the plate umpire.

You say that this brings attention to the umpire whom isn't wearing patent leather by coaches and players. I would guess more often than not, the coaches and the players have no idea what the umpires are or are not wearing.

Most coaches have a hard enough time getting simple rules straight in their own minds, let alone sit there and discuss with their assistant the difference between belt styles worn by the base and plate umpire or that the base umpire really should be wearing patent leather base shoes if the plate umpire is wearing patent leather plate shoes.

Maybe not, but if one ump is wearing the patent leather while another is not, don't be surprised if the coach notices "something" about the ump without the bright, shiny shoes. They may not be able to put their finger on it, but there will be something that doesn't "seem right." As such, they will look at that ump differently.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ATLUmpSteve
I didn't say just ASA; I said at higher levels of softball.

I wasn't directing my comments to your post, I was only saying that because I only call ASA. Just using myself as an example. :)

AtlUmpSteve Tue Aug 21, 2007 11:36am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blu_IN
You say that this brings attention to the umpire whom isn't wearing patent leather by coaches and players. I would guess more often than not, the coaches and the players have no idea what the umpires are or are not wearing.

Most coaches have a hard enough time getting simple rules straight in their own minds, let alone sit there and discuss with their assistant the difference between belt styles worn by the base and plate umpire or that the base umpire really should be wearing patent leather base shoes if the plate umpire is wearing patent leather plate shoes.

I have heard college coaches, needing to get the last word in any conversation, walk away with a stage whispered comment that they shouldn't have expected him to get the call right, he doesn't even know what belt to wear. At least at the D1 level, they notice EVERYTHING, anything to use against us. Why give them that ammunition?

bkbjones Tue Aug 21, 2007 03:28pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blu_IN
So, those that want to change with the times, should not because the old fear change? That road goes both ways Irish.

BBK, you won't take me seriously because I misspell a word. Sorry if my time is valuable enough not to spell check my posts. Its a forum, not an important work memo/document.

You are telling ME that time -- any time -- is valuable? Now with what I have been through in the past year, THAT is funny. It's been a crappy year, but I appreciate the laugh.

As for taking you seriously, you obviously didn't get past the first sentence of my post. If I go over to work a baseball game and give "robot" outs and strikes, use my indicator on the bases and clean off bases and the pitching rubber, what are they going to say? Why won't THEY change with the times?

If I go over to the baseball board and tell them they need to start cleaning off bases because I carry a brush on the field, I'd be laughed out of the room (I can just imagine what HHH and JRut would say).

And you know what? I'd DESERVE to be laughed out of the room. There are things you don't do in baseball...and things you don't do in softball. Why is that so hard to comprehend?

IRISHMAFIA Tue Aug 21, 2007 03:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blu_IN
Irish,

I am pretty sure they already don't expect the base umpire to be wearing patent leather plate shoes in order to match the plate umpire.

You say that this brings attention to the umpire whom isn't wearing patent leather by coaches and players. I would guess more often than not, the coaches and the players have no idea what the umpires are or are not wearing.

Most coaches have a hard enough time getting simple rules straight in their own minds, let alone sit there and discuss with their assistant the difference between belt styles worn by the base and plate umpire or that the base umpire really should be wearing patent leather base shoes if the plate umpire is wearing patent leather plate shoes.

As a former player and coach, I can say that you are mistaken. An umpire's appearance IS noticed. As a UIC, I can say that you are mistaken. I hear about umpire appearance routinely from players and coaches. Some good, some bad.

Read Steve's post which included the NCAA umpire manual paste. It is accurate.

You can do whatever you want, wherever you want when you are working for people/organizations/associations that don't care. When it comes to those who do care, you are lucky you live in this country, because you now have a choice. Either you can do it their way, or go home. I'm sure that the UIC or assigner do not want to see you go, but that's just the way it is. Everyone cares, but when it comes right down to it, only the individual can make that decision.

MD Longhorn Tue Aug 21, 2007 04:09pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blu_IN
How do we lose uniformity by the plate umpire wearing patent leather? They are black, they are shined, they are as exactly as they should be. Patent leather belts. . . again black.

How exactly does that make us look out of uniform?

Let me ask you ... why do you wear it? (You mentioned earlier that you thought it showed style)... so ... by your own admission, it looks different (in your opinion better) than non-patent-leather.

Different = non-uniform. You could make the equally wrong argument in favor of Light Blue hats. You might think they look better - but they are different, and thus non-uniform. Truly, I'm surprised this is even a topic.

MD Longhorn Tue Aug 21, 2007 04:10pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blu_IN
I would guess more often than not, the coaches and the players have no idea what the umpires are or are not wearing.

You would guess wrong.

Mountaineer Tue Aug 21, 2007 05:52pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
As a former player and coach, I can say that you are mistaken. An umpire's appearance IS noticed. As a UIC, I can say that you are mistaken. I hear about umpire appearance routinely from players and coaches. Some good, some bad.

Read Steve's post which included the NCAA umpire manual paste. It is accurate.

You can do whatever you want, wherever you want when you are working for people/organizations/associations that don't care. When it comes to those who do care, you are lucky you live in this country, because you now have a choice. Either you can do it their way, or go home. I'm sure that isn't what the UIC or assigner do not want to see you go, but that's just the way it is. Everyone cares, but when it comes right down to it, only the individual can make that decision.

Good post Mike.

BHBlue Tue Aug 21, 2007 06:52pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mountaineer
I have both patent leather and regular. I wear the patent leather on dry days when the dust is dominant and the regular ones during rainy/muddy days. I agree that the patent leather is easier to clean - simply wipe off and they are shiny as new. Our college supervisor and HS interpreter allows patent leather so we wear them. I also wear a belt that matches the shoes. I know that if I were to go to an NCAA regional that I'd need to wear the non-patent leather plate shoes.

Good luck with THAT once someone from the Staff comes to evaluate you and your patent leather.

Mountaineer Tue Aug 21, 2007 08:32pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BHBlue
Good luck with THAT once someone from the Staff comes to evaluate you and your patent leather.

Well one of our umpires got a regional 2 years ago and he wears patent leather - he was told not to bring them to the regionals! He said that the first day, they made everyone put all their equipment on the table and they went through it and tossed what he couldn't use. He got to keep his cup and chest protector! I'm not really worried about it - like I said, my supervisor allows it. To be honest, this past season I only wore them in a couple college games because we had so much rain and I wore my mudders.

BHBlue Tue Aug 21, 2007 09:15pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mountaineer
Well one of our umpires got a regional 2 years ago and he wears patent leather - he was told not to bring them to the regionals! He said that the first day, they made everyone put all their equipment on the table and they went through it and tossed what he couldn't use. He got to keep his cup and chest protector! I'm not really worried about it - like I said, my supervisor allows it. To be honest, this past season I only wore them in a couple college games because we had so much rain and I wore my mudders.

Fair enough. However, if you have both, why not wear what is approved by the staff? You never know who is in the stands watching you work. Especially if you're on their "watch list".

Don't get me wrong, I wear non-western cut and pleated pants, work in the Gerry Davis, etc. when working youth and men's ball, but I do not in college. Why? Because the people who set the standards say not to. It is that simple to me.

Skahtboi Tue Aug 21, 2007 09:36pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mountaineer
I'm not really worried about it - like I said, my supervisor allows it.


Well then, it sounds as if your NCAA coordinator refuses to comply with the national standard as well as with the NCAA Umpire Improvement Program, and therefore is doing you, and all the NCAA umpires in your area, as well as the NCAA itself a grave disservice.

AtlUmpSteve Tue Aug 21, 2007 10:22pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BHBlue
Fair enough. However, if you have both, why not wear what is approved by the staff? You never know who is in the stands watching you work. Especially if you're on their "watch list".

Don't get me wrong, I wear non-western cut and pleated pants, work in the Gerry Davis, etc. when working youth and men's ball, but I do not in college. Why? Because the people who set the standards say not to. It is that simple to me.

Take that a step further. We all buy new uniform items regularly. I will only buy that which is universally accepted. Yes, I have non-western pants; but I will not buy any more. And, they are the mudders; or worn when I work rec ball. They are the backups. I don't want to be seen by those I work with being anything but the example of what is correct.

Mountaineer Wed Aug 22, 2007 05:49am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skahtboi
Well then, it sounds as if your NCAA coordinator refuses to comply with the national standard as well as with the NCAA Umpire Improvement Program, and therefore is doing you, and all the NCAA umpires in your area, as well as the NCAA itself a grave disservice.

OK, so because I wear patent leather shoes I do a disservice to the NCAA? Nice try! To be fair to my supervisor, I've never heard her say it's OK, she's seen me work and never mentioned anything. I know other guys in the same conferences that wear patent leather and one guy even wears a blue mask.

I go out on the field looking freshly pressed and neat every single game. I know guys that go out and never iron a pant or even put a brush to their shoes - but thank God they aren't patent leather. At least they are following protocol!

Skahtboi Wed Aug 22, 2007 06:42am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mountaineer
OK, so because I wear patent leather shoes I do a disservice to the NCAA? Nice try! To be fair to my supervisor, I've never heard her say it's OK, she's seen me work and never mentioned anything. I know other guys in the same conferences that wear patent leather and one guy even wears a blue mask.

I go out on the field looking freshly pressed and neat every single game. I know guys that go out and never iron a pant or even put a brush to their shoes - but thank God they aren't patent leather. At least they are following protocol!

You complete missed the entire point of the post.

By "not saying anything" about the patent leather, your supervisor is failing to pass along to you the mandates made by the entities I mentioned in my previous post, therefore not doing as requested by them. Subsequently, the umpires in your area who are working NCAA ball are not getting the information that they should have, the not wearing of patent leather only being a small part of this information. This is exactly how these types of programs begin to break down. This is where the disservice I mention occurs.

Dakota Wed Aug 22, 2007 07:55am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mountaineer
... I know guys that go out and never iron a pant or even put a brush to their shoes - but thank God they aren't patent leather. At least they are following protocol!

To quote you, "nice try."

From the NCAA umpire manual quoted above in this thread:
Quote:

If the first impression you give people is sloppy, disheveled or overly casual they will assume these character traits for you....

Your uniform is the only thing in umpiring that you can always get 100 percent right. But you cannot get more than 100 percent. Uniform means alike, the same.

If you do something differently with your uniform–wear a patent leather belt or shoes, press your shirt differently–then you are no longer uniform, and instead of the 110 percent you hoped to achieve, you are now down to about 75 percent. ...

Get your uniform to 100 percent. Clean and polished shoes, clean and unwrinkled shirt, clean and pressed pants, clean and blocked hat, and clean, uncracked and polished belt are the requisites of a uniform at 100 percent. Maintain it there.
Seems to me the NCAA put patent leather in the same category as a wrinkled and dirty uniform, didn't they? That is, a uniform that is less than 100%.

MD Longhorn Wed Aug 22, 2007 09:26am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mountaineer
OK, so because I wear patent leather shoes I do a disservice to the NCAA?

Reading is Fundamental... that's NOT what he said.

IRISHMAFIA Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:39am

Remember way back in post #2 of this thread?

Man, now you've done it. :eek:

I guess I need to run out and buy a lottery ticket. :D

NCASAUmp Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:42am

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
Remember way back in post #2 of this thread?

Man, now you've done it. :eek:

I guess I need to run out and buy a lottery ticket. :D

Get me one, too, Mr Lucky Pants. Powerball's up to $245 mil!

Dakota Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:15pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by NCASAUmp
Get me one, too, Mr Lucky Pants. Powerball's up to $245 mil!

I don''t think predicting the predictable qualifies as "lucky", exactly. ;)

Dakota Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:22pm

I do have a curiosity question, though, for anyone who has and wears both regular and patent leather plate shoes...

The only patent leather shoes I've ever worn were what came with rental tuxes, and those shoes were uncomfortable in just about every way possible, but the part attributable to the finish of the leather was that my feet got hot and sweaty - and I was mostly just standing around, and they were very stiff.

So, my question: Do you notice a difference in comfort between the two? Do the natural leather shoes flex more easily and breathe better? I would think so.

Personally (even if the softball HFMICs endorsed patent leather), the shoes would seem completely unsuitable for any athletic use and I would not use them for that purpose. The ease of cleaning and glaringly shiny look would not be a good trade-off for stiff sweaty shoes.

tcblue13 Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dakota
Darn, and my Uncle Herb has given me his entire collection of patent leather belts, too. Wait, I can't use them anyway - they're white! :D

Hmmm... Maybe I could get a plaid plate coat....

Uncle Herb???
http://downloads.weblogger.com/weblo...now/WKRP09.jpg
Tarlek???

MNBlue Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:45pm

Found this thread on the football board.

http://forum.officiating.com/showthread.php?t=37711

Maybe there is a market for patent leather in a different sport?

UMP 64 Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:49pm

Patent Leather anything
 
If patent leather is what you have, just keep wearing it, it will evidentially loosen up and conform to your waist like any other HD belt. Yes, I wear patent leather belt & 3/4 plate shoes. If they are good enough for Gerry Davis in pro baseball, who worked the dish last night, Cincy over Atlanta game, they are good enough for me or any one else who wants to look professional. If you think patent leather has on place in "SOFTBALL", get over it. I work HS & college baseball & softball and see patent in both. If you don't like it, don't use it. Your shoes probably look like they have not been cleaned in weeks. The advantages of patent are many and they do hold up well. 5 & 6 years for 2 pairs. Thank you Gerry Davis for making what I think is the BEST plate shoe out there.
Work on your mechanics and do not worry what someone else wants to wear.

Dakota Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:58pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by tcblue13

EXACTLY!

One of my favorite comedies of all time! :D (Glad you got the reference.) :D

Dakota Wed Aug 22, 2007 01:02pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by UMP 64
If patent leather is what you have, just keep wearing it, it will evidentially loosen up and conform to your waist like any other HD belt. Yes, I wear patent leather belt & 3/4 plate shoes. If they are good enough for Gerry Davis in pro baseball, who worked the dish last night, Cincy over Atlanta game, they are good enough for me or any one else who wants to look professional. If you think patent leather has on place in "SOFTBALL", get over it. I work HS & college baseball & softball and see patent in both. If you don't like it, don't use it. Your shoes probably look like they have not been cleaned in weeks. The advantages of patent are many and they do hold up well. 5 & 6 years for 2 pairs. Thank you Gerry Davis for making what I think is the BEST plate shoe out there.
Work on your mechanics and do not worry what someone else wants to wear.

I guess you told us!

So, I guess you have no issue with leather ball bags, either.

In case you hadn't noticed, there are not too many MLB umpire groupies on this board.

Also in case you hadn't noticed, there are not too many here who give a rat's behind what MLB umpires wear. That seems to be an infatuation on the small ball board, I know. But, it is a big "yawn" here.

tcblue13 Wed Aug 22, 2007 01:04pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by UMP 64
If patent leather is what you have, just keep wearing it, it will evidentially loosen up and conform to your waist like any other HD belt. Yes, I wear patent leather belt & 3/4 plate shoes. If they are good enough for Gerry Davis in pro baseball, who worked the dish last night, Cincy over Atlanta game, they are good enough for me or any one else who wants to look professional. If you think patent leather has on place in "SOFTBALL", get over it. I work HS & college baseball & softball and see patent in both. If you don't like it, don't use it. Your shoes probably look like they have not been cleaned in weeks. The advantages of patent are many and they do hold up well. 5 & 6 years for 2 pairs. Thank you Gerry Davis for making what I think is the BEST plate shoe out there.
Work on your mechanics and do not worry what someone else wants to wear.

What is your opinion on using the 4 wheel indicator (your clicker)? Leather hip pouch? deerskin mask pads? gel pens? changing a coin from pocket to pocket to remember which team is at bat? throwing a yellow flag to signal obstruction? blowing a whistle at the end of a time limit? Hanging your water bottle on the inside of the fence right behind home plate? Wearing your hat backwards under your mask? Giving a red card to an ejected coach?

tcblue13 Wed Aug 22, 2007 01:06pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dakota
I guess you told us!

So, I guess you have no issue with leather ball bags, either.

In case you hadn't noticed, there are not too many MLB umpire groupies on this board.

Also in case you hadn't noticed, there are not too many here who give a rat's behind what MLB umpires wear. That seems to be an infatuation on the small ball board, I know. But, it is a big "yawn" here.

Great minds do think alike

PtotheB Wed Aug 22, 2007 01:51pm

Dakota asked: So, my question: Do you notice a difference in comfort between the two? Do the natural leather shoes flex more easily and breathe better?

Being in the Army for 20+ years has given me the opportunity to apply a bit of polish to leather. Needless to say I was happier than Michael Jackson at Boystown when we switched to suede boots. Our shoes that we wear with our dress and some service uniforms are made of a substance called Corfram mentioned earlier in this post. It is far more comfortable and breathable than old patent leather. I would assume that the shoes sold today as patent leather are actually Corfram and that would make them as good or better than some cheap cuts of leather. It would take a significant emtional event to get me to even consider "patent leather" shoes. I can and do apply a good old fashioned spit shine to my shoes before every game even during tournaments. It's a matter of pride.

Dakota Wed Aug 22, 2007 02:13pm

My last spit shine was in ROTC, and that was (lets just say), some time ago! But, I bet I could still make it shine with the best of 'em. These days, though, I find the Kiwi Parade Polish will brush up to a very nice shine. It won't blind anyone, but it looks very good.

Dakota Wed Aug 22, 2007 02:14pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by tcblue13
Great minds do think alike

Yeah. I do read the baseball board from time-to-time. Some of their flame wars are very entertaining. :)

IRISHMAFIA Wed Aug 22, 2007 06:38pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by UMP 64
If patent leather is what you have, just keep wearing it, it will evidentially loosen up and conform to your waist like any other HD belt. Yes, I wear patent leather belt & 3/4 plate shoes. If they are good enough for Gerry Davis in pro baseball, who worked the dish last night, Cincy over Atlanta game, they are good enough for me or any one else who wants to look professional.

Who gives a damn about Gerry Davis? He's an umpire doing a job for money, pretty much like the rest of us, just at a more marketable level.

Quote:

If you think patent leather has on place in "SOFTBALL", get over it. I work HS & college baseball & softball and see patent in both. If you don't like it, don't use it. Your shoes probably look like they have not been cleaned in weeks.
What an idiotic statement that is. You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. I know many an umpire who can bring a comparable shine (without Leather Lustre) to a shoe simply by shining them. Clean and polished is all the needs to be accomplished. And remember, the better the shoe looks walking onto the field, the worse it looks when it gets dirty or damaged.

Quote:

The advantages of patent are many and they do hold up well. 5 & 6 years for 2 pairs.
I've worn the same pairs of New Balance for four year on and off the field on a regular basis. The treatment applied TO a piece of leather and shoe will never replace the treatment OF a piece of leather and shoe. The fact that they are made of patent leather has no bearing on the wear.

Quote:

Thank you Gerry Davis for making what I think is the BEST plate shoe out there.
Yeah, he slaves all day, cobbling away. :rolleyes:

Quote:

Work on your mechanics and do not worry what someone else wants to wear.
You should be doing that anyway.

IRISHMAFIA Wed Aug 22, 2007 07:09pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by PtotheB
Our shoes that we wear with our dress and some service uniforms are made of a substance called Corfram mentioned earlier in this post. It is far more comfortable and breathable than old patent leather.

Actually, Corfam (a duPont product) does not breath well even though it is considered a poromeric. I just about grew up in a kid tannery, so when I brought home a pair of Corfam shoes (for inspection only, USN), my dad just looked at me with a blank stare. Turns out, the tannery had some low level of involvement in part of the processing towards the end of production, so they made at least a little money against lost income. Actually, I probably wore them less than 50 times as my feet sweat and they were not comfortable.

Here is a brief on the product:

Corfam was the first poromeric imitation leather, invented by Lee Hollowell, and introduced by DuPont in 1963 at the Chicago Shoe Show. Corfam was the centerpiece of the DuPont pavilion at the 1964 New York World's Fair in New York City. Its major advantages over natural leather were its durability and its high gloss finish that could be easily cleaned with a damp cloth. Its disadvantages were its stiffness which did not lessen with wearing and its relative lack of breathability. DuPont manufactured Corfam at its plant in Old Hickory, Tennessee from 1964 to 1971. After spending millions of dollars marketing the product to shoe manufacturers, DuPont withdrew Corfam from the market in 1971 and sold the rights to a company in Poland. Corfam is mainly remembered as a textbook marketing disaster.
The 1966 Chilean issue of Reader's Digest claimed that by 1983 there would not be enough leather from cows, demand exceeding supply by 30%.
Corfam is still used today in some products, an example being certain types of equestrian saddle girth. Corfam shoes are still very popular in the military and other uniformed professions where shiny shoes are an asset.

Mountaineer Wed Aug 22, 2007 07:44pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dakota
I do have a curiosity question, though, for anyone who has and wears both regular and patent leather plate shoes...

So, my question: Do you notice a difference in comfort between the two? Do the natural leather shoes flex more easily and breathe better? I would think so.

OK, I'll bite . . . honestly, I don't see a difference. They "may" be just a little stiffer but I don't see any major difference in one being hotter than the other. I also wear them for basketball which requires a lot more running and they move fine without extra heat. I'm guessing that they have developed a softer, kindler patent leather.:D

Steve M Wed Aug 22, 2007 08:42pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dakota
I do have a curiosity question, though, for anyone who has and wears both regular and patent leather plate shoes...

The only patent leather shoes I've ever worn were what came with rental tuxes, and those shoes were uncomfortable in just about every way possible, but the part attributable to the finish of the leather was that my feet got hot and sweaty - and I was mostly just standing around, and they were very stiff.

So, my question: Do you notice a difference in comfort between the two? Do the natural leather shoes flex more easily and breathe better? I would think so.

Personally (even if the softball HFMICs endorsed patent leather), the shoes would seem completely unsuitable for any athletic use and I would not use them for that purpose. The ease of cleaning and glaringly shiny look would not be a good trade-off for stiff sweaty shoes.

Tom,
I wear both types and do not notice a difference in comfort or in heat. But I would not notice a difference in heat as I am generally soaked after a game - it's one reason why I really prefer the navy pants when I work the plate, the grays end up as two-tone and nobody can tell that my pants are all wet in the navy.:o Both types of shoe seem to flex equally well, both broke in in a reasonable amount of time, and both types seem to last - the regular style has conservatively seen over 700 plate games and the patent leather ones have been through over 300 plate games.

Skahtboi Wed Aug 22, 2007 09:58pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
Yeah, he slaves all day, cobbling away. :rolleyes:

Thanks Mike. You just taught me a very valuable lesson. Don't read umpiring threads while sitting in the recliner with a laptop and eating. There is crud all over my screen, now, from where I spewed with laughter at this comment of yours. :D

bkbjones Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:43pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by UMP 64
Yes, I wear patent leather belt & 3/4 plate shoes. If they are good enough for Gerry Davis in pro baseball,...

Dammit! I got ROBBED! My Gerry Davis plate shoes are REAL leather! And I could have gotten PATENT leather?

Now, lookie here Ump 64 and whoever else wants to put me and others down. I can make a pair of real leather shoes shine just like those fancy assed patent leather shoes. I can make my belt shine too. All it takes is a little work. It's that first impression thing...and I can guarandamnedtee you that every college coach around here (and most of the community college coaches) and top flight travel ball coaches know what umpires are supposed to wear (oh, hey, they know the rules, too).

If they see some clown come on the field with patent leather shoes and a patent leather belt, ya know what they think? It shows that umpires doesn't know what they are supposed to wear, and if they do, they're probably too lazy to shine up the real stuff. You might be the nicest guy in the world, but I have no room for laziness. Lazy people cheat ME and every other hard-working umpire -- and IMHO, patent leather = laziness.

mike31 Wed Aug 29, 2007 01:13pm

I can't help it
 
Any time I see an umpire in patent leather at a softball game, I think he's a baseball official who's stooped to do an easy game for a change... a lesser game anyway.

IRISHMAFIA Wed Aug 29, 2007 10:34pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mike31
Any time I see an umpire in patent leather at a softball game, I think he's a baseball official who's stooped to do an easy game for a change... a lesser game anyway.

Another idiotic statement from someone who hasn't the slightest idea of the subject upon which they have chosen to comment.

Dakota Thu Aug 30, 2007 12:25am

He was obviously just being a troll, Mike. Wanted to get a rise out of someone about "easy game" ... and when that didn't work, he edited the post 9 hours later to add "lesser game." He doesn't even know how to be a good troll.

bkbjones Thu Aug 30, 2007 12:54am

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
Another idiotic statement from someone who hasn't the slightest idea of the subject upon which they have chosen to comment.

Which means he is PERFECT for the LL Softball WS.:D

Julio Caliente Thu Aug 30, 2007 08:14am

Quote:

Originally Posted by mike31
Any time I see an umpire in patent leather at a softball game, I think he's a baseball official who's stooped to do an easy game for a change... a lesser game anyway.

I have done a few years of BB and this year got my first introduction to FP SB and your post shows somebody who has no idea what they are talking about. In my opinion (what ever that is worth) baseball is easier to call than softball, but softball take less time. By that I mean that in BB you have much more time between the action to stretch, rest your legs, etc. In SB you are almost always "on the move" because the game is much more fast paced. Basically, you have to bust your *** a many more times in SB than in BB to be in the right place to make the best call you can.

Skahtboi Thu Aug 30, 2007 09:56am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Julio Caliente
I have done a few years of BB and this year got my first introduction to FP SB and your post shows somebody who has no idea what they are talking about. In my opinion (what ever that is worth) baseball is easier to call than softball, but softball take less time. By that I mean that in BB you have much more time between the action to stretch, rest your legs, etc. In SB you are almost always "on the move" because the game is much more fast paced. Basically, you have to bust your *** a many more times in SB than in BB to be in the right place to make the best call you can.

I believe Mike meant his post tongue in cheek. He was speaking as a baseball umpire would.

Dakota Thu Aug 30, 2007 11:07am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skahtboi
I believe Mike meant his post tongue in cheek. He was speaking as a baseball umpire would.

I'm stickin' with my troll theory.

Skahtboi Thu Aug 30, 2007 01:40pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dakota
I'm stickin' with my troll theory.

I just noticed the edit, and recant my previous post. I agree that he was just trying to get a rise out the community, now.

bkbjones Thu Aug 30, 2007 06:35pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dakota
I'm stickin' with my troll theory.

I think it's more than that. I think it's a troll conspiracy theory. One troll has been conspicuous in his absence (did he sprain his fists?), and now we suddenly have another.

I'm looking all over the place for another one. I think I just saw one behind the wall across the street...

tcblue13 Thu Aug 30, 2007 07:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bkbjones
I think it's more than that. I think it's a troll conspiracy theory. One troll has been conspicuous in his absence (did he sprain his fists?), and now we suddenly have another.

I'm looking all over the place for another one. I think I just saw one behind the wall across the street...

He's under the bridge and we're just a bunch of old goats:D

Dakota Thu Aug 30, 2007 09:17pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by tcblue13
He's under the bridge and we're just a bunch of old goats:D

That would be old GRUFF goats!

Andy Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:37am

Quote:

Originally Posted by bkbjones
...I think I just saw one behind the wall across the street...

Did you check the grassy knoll.......

IRISHMAFIA Fri Aug 31, 2007 03:00pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy
Did you check the grassy knoll.......

Too busy ducking for cover

bkbjones Fri Aug 31, 2007 04:29pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
Too busy ducking for cover

Cover...did you say cover...oh my gawd I forgot to look under the manhole covers!

mike31 Fri Aug 31, 2007 07:22pm

Teach me more about trolling later. Seriously, I'm new to postings.

I think baseball officials think their game is superior and consequently they buy baseball gear (blue mask with tan pads, shiny patent leather, ball bags with POS boldly showing). When he wears that onto a softball diamond, what does that say to you who are softball only?

I think he thinks this is a lesser game, so he can dress as he pleases, just as he might do for a scrimmage.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:59am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1