The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 11, 2006, 02:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 204
Double Base - Foul Territory

ASA Men's 12" SP - Double Base at 1B

Batter hits a hot shot to F3 - Ball bounces off F3 into foul territory - F3 retrieves ball and dives back touching orange (foul) side of bag just ahead of BR - I call BR "OUT" - Get big argument that the fielder cannot use orange part of bag, but as I read the rule the fielder can use the orange part when making a play from foul territory.

Was I correct?
__________________
Travis
ASA Umpire
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 11, 2006, 02:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Correctomundo. (This board does not allow me to simply type "Correct." Says the post is too short. OOO board.)
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 11, 2006, 02:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA; Atlanta area
Posts: 2,822
Correct ruling. Force play made from foul territory.
__________________
Steve
ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 11, 2006, 04:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 994
Yeah? Oh, I guess you are right.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 11, 2006, 08:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Northeastern NC
Posts: 487
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC Ump
Yeah? Oh, I guess you are right.
I guess he is
__________________
TCBLUE13
NFHS, PONY, Babe Ruth, LL, NSA

Softball in the Bible
"In the big-inning"

Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 11, 2006, 10:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota
Correctomundo. (This board does not allow me to simply type "Correct." Says the post is too short. OOO board.)
Affirmative. You are CORRECT!!
__________________
Joe Herzer
Dallas, TX DSUA
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 12, 2006, 08:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 727
Just to clarify: This is not the case in NFHS. The defense may only use the orange portion of the base if a thrown from foul ground or if an errant or missed throw pulls the defensive player into foul ground. 8-10-2.
__________________
"Not all heroes have time to pose for sculptors...some still have papers to grade."
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 12, 2006, 10:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoBits
Just to clarify: This is not the case in NFHS. The defense may only use the orange portion of the base if a thrown from foul ground or if an errant or missed throw pulls the defensive player into foul ground. 8-10-2.
Seems to me that is exactly what everyone stated.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 12, 2006, 11:07am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 727
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
Seems to me that is exactly what everyone stated.
The thread started with the situation of a batted ball bouncing off F3 into foul territory. According to NFHS rules, the use of the orange bag by the defense is only mentioned along with a throw by the defense.
__________________
"Not all heroes have time to pose for sculptors...some still have papers to grade."
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 12, 2006, 10:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoBits
Just to clarify: This is not the case in NFHS. The defense may only use the orange portion of the base if a thrown from foul ground or if an errant or missed throw pulls the defensive player into foul ground. 8-10-2.
Editorial comment: NFHS needs to get serious about the double base, or just forget it entirely. They have been sneaking up on it for years. They finally moved it into the rule book proper, but left it as by state association adoption. I don't know if that means they also do not think it completely through, but if your interp is correct for NFHS (I agree it is how the rule reads), then I guess they want the players crossing paths in this situation.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 12, 2006, 10:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota
Editorial comment: NFHS needs to get serious about the double base, or just forget it entirely. They have been sneaking up on it for years. They finally moved it into the rule book proper, but left it as by state association adoption. I don't know if that means they also do not think it completely through, but if your interp is correct for NFHS (I agree it is how the rule reads), then I guess they want the players crossing paths in this situation.
I wouldn't doubt that the reason the Fed is slow moving to completely accept it is because they fear "forcing" schools to buy new equipment and the thousand excuses why it cannot happen here or there.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 12, 2006, 12:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota
Editorial comment: NFHS needs to get serious about the double base, or just forget it entirely. They have been sneaking up on it for years. They finally moved it into the rule book proper, but left it as by state association adoption. I don't know if that means they also do not think it completely through, but if your interp is correct for NFHS (I agree it is how the rule reads), then I guess they want the players crossing paths in this situation.
Let's write a rule, preferably copied verbatim from PONY except saying "foul-side, outside or colored" instead of "orange" and add it to the list WMB was going to present.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 15, 2006, 12:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 101
Hi,

To date, the Softball Canada rule book does not include the "... fielder can use the orange part when making a play from foul territory ..." rule.

Note, however, that I was at a mechanics clinic Saturday where the clinician mentioned that one of our provinces, British Columbia, is now deviating via special operating rule and allows that play from the foul side.

I guess the hope is the B-R will use the white bag to avoid a collision.

If I had a vote, I'd remove that foul side provision.

Regards, bobbrix
__________________
bobbrix
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 15, 2006, 12:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbrix
If I had a vote, I'd remove that foul side provision.
Why? .....
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 15, 2006, 01:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota
Why? .....
I haven't seen the play used, since we don't allow it ... but, if the intent is to reduce collisions, then does it achieve that goal?

It seems to me the "more skilled" players would actually use it for that purpose because they can think ahead based on at-a-glance situations, but for the younger ones it would just lead to them getting in the way more often.

I have this picture in my head of B-R barreling down to first base and F3 not paying enough attention to where B-R is headed (and vice versa) ... more and more occurrences of obstruction/interference arguments because of lazy F3's ???

After all these years we still have trouble training people on the initial rules for the double base ... now they're just adding more scenarios and thereby adding more confusion.

I'm willing to be converted!

Am I wrong?

Over ... bobbrix
__________________
bobbrix
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IP with F6 in Foul territory prior to the pitch Rattlehead Softball 6 Mon May 08, 2006 01:06pm
1st / 3rd basemen straddling the bag in foul territory Mista Bone Baseball 36 Wed Jun 29, 2005 03:44pm
1 foot in foul territory ChrisSportsFan Baseball 10 Thu Jun 16, 2005 09:42am
Offensive players cheering their team in foul territory spots101 Baseball 7 Wed May 22, 2002 01:30pm
FOUL TERRITORY BDUGAN Softball 2 Wed Jun 07, 2000 02:32pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:59pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1