Subsequent Actions

[Dakota]

I don't like the directive we are given for judging the effects of OBS... I would prefer a "lost steps" method or something.

Having said that, I have benefited greatly from these discussions in that I have gained better insight into how ASA / NFHS want this call made. I am even coming to understand their logic... It is, after all, based on the general intent of the rule - namely to re-level the play back to what it would have been without the OBS.

I can live with the approach, and I do not believe that, in general, it results in a significant injustice to either team.

I would still prefer to be able to see the play through and then judge, however.