![]() |
|
|
|||
B causes IP(?)
High level ball, Gold qualifier.
F1 taking signal, batter says "time" a moment before separation of hands. I don't allow the timeout, and batter does not deviate from her "ready" position at bat. F1 stops her action immediately after separating her hands. All this happens within a second, of course. In my opinion, the batter's word caused F1's hesitation. I don't call IP. OC goes ballistic, demanding an IP. "I train my girls to step out ONLY if time is granted. If it's not, and they let a strike go down the middle, they have to deal with me." If batter never uttered a word, and F1 did what she did, of course I'd have IP. So, does my opinion dictate the result here (at this level)? Last edited by jmkupka; Mon Jun 19, 2017 at 08:21pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Quote:
The interpretation (case book, I believe) to which you are referring I believe notes a batter raising her hand (toward the pitcher) in an attempt to draw an IP. I'll say it again, requesting "time" is not an illegal act, nor an attempt to draw an IP. Pitchers should be and ARE coached to complete any pitch once started. IMO, the OP is an IP.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Quote:
Unless the batter is trying to bait the pitcher, this is an IP. The onus is on the pitcher to deliver a legal pitch no matter what the batter is doing. Once the hands go together, we're going to have a pitch, legal or illegal. At low levels, I might kill it and reset it. I can sell that in rec ball. At the Gold qualifier level, IP all day every day.
__________________
Powder blue since 1998. Longtime forum lurker. Umpiring Goals: Call the knee strike accurately (getting the low pitch since 2017)/NCAA D1 postseason/ISF-WBSC Certification/Nat'l Indicator Fraternity(completed) "I'm gonna call it ASA for the foreseeable future. You all know what I mean." Last edited by teebob21; Mon Jun 19, 2017 at 11:39pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
At Rec league or low level travel ball I'm not calling an IP and will kill it with a no pitch. At the higher level I better have a near certainty that the offensive team is baiting the pitcher. |
|
|||
I'm going to disagree with my two esteemed colleagues on this one....
Irish is absolutely correct that it is not illegal to request time and Tee is correct that, by rule, the action must be done with the intent to cause an IP. While the action of requesting time is not illegal, it is unusual. It doesn't happen on every pitch with every batter. The "intent" of the batter in most of these situations is to disrupt the pitcher from her pitching routine. The batter usually thinks that the pitcher is taking too long to deliver the pitch, so she (batter) wants to make the pitcher start over. If an IP is called, not only has the batter succeeded in disrupting the pitcher, she has received the "bonus" of an IP that her actions directly led to. Yes...a GOLD level pitcher should know enough that once she starts the pitch to finish it. However, I'm not going to allow an unusual action of the batter, even though it's a legal one, to result in an IP. Call time, No pitch, reset and go again.
__________________
It's what you learn after you think you know it all that's important! |
|
|||
Quote:
The moment I see the pitcher deviating, I "grant" the time. Perhaps loudly and boldly. |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Quote:
If a team's batters start asking for time right as the pitcher starts her motion, then that's obvious enough to me that the intent is to disconcert. I respectfully disagree with Andy that the intent of the batter IN MOST CASES is to disrupt the pitcher's timing. If that was the case, I would have issued far more warnings for this than my current lifetime count of zero. Rather, I suspect the intent is for the batter to refocus and reset herself when a pitch is slow in coming. We're not mind readers, so who knows. Ten or twenty seconds is a long time to stand ready in that batter's box, and the "coaching" that comes from the stands is usually to "make the pitcher reset". IMO, boo to that idea. This isn't baseball: the pitcher gets a certain amount of time to throw and she can use as much or as little of it as she likes. The rule is there to keep the game moving with consistent pace, and granting time to a batter unnecessarily is a great way to slow down the game. Fed and NCAA have rules covering when a pitcher violates based on a batter's "innocent" actions or simultaneous violations, but USA/ASA does not. I gotta call an IP here.
__________________
Powder blue since 1998. Longtime forum lurker. Umpiring Goals: Call the knee strike accurately (getting the low pitch since 2017)/NCAA D1 postseason/ISF-WBSC Certification/Nat'l Indicator Fraternity(completed) "I'm gonna call it ASA for the foreseeable future. You all know what I mean." |
|
|||
From the OP, unless the pitcher was hanging the batter out the timing of the verbal time request along with the coaches reaction to the IP not being called sounds to me like this was a coached tactic to try and illicit an IP.
Information not included in the OP that could very well have bearing on the situation, were there any runners on base and if so where were they? How convenient would it be in a critical point in the game with a runner on 3rd base to get an IP called? |
|
|||
Quote:
If in your opinion the batter caused F1's hesitation then just call time and it is a do over. As for the coach going ballistic--explain to him what happened and if he persists calmly remind hm that it is YOU who are in charge of the game. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|