![]() |
Base Umpire 2 man
Just curious. A while ago I read in here (I think) about some organizations using a mechanic where the base umpire starts in the so-called B slot, even when there is no one on base. As I am nearing the end of my umpiring career, I thought I'd give it a try in the JV games that I am getting these days. I like it a lot. It saves a lot of my energy for situations that require me to have to move more quickly. Most of my calls at 1st are quite routine and I'm right in position to call them w/o having to move much. Has anyone else tried it or (perish the thought that we change anything) adopted it?
|
Quote:
|
I have used it in FP, especially during summer showcase tournaments where we were doing 6-7 games in a day. Of course, I discussed it in pre-game with partner to make sure they didn't have a problem with it. Called it my modified base mechanics for survival mode.
It definitely is an energy saver, not having to get back all the way over to A.:cool: |
That is still an ASA 2 umpire slow pitch mechanic.
At one time, it was an optimal mechanic for NCAA two umpire. It is no longer an option in NCAA. |
My opinion is that, while it is a real step-saver, it effectively writes off any realistic possibility of monitoring illegal pitches related to contact with the pitcher's plate; either the stride foot not in contact with the back, or the pivot foot sliding off the front. So, effective only if 1) all pitchers are completely legal relative to those issues, or 2) the showcase you are working doesn't want those called even if they exist.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Like I said, these are JV games. The girls are lucky if they know how to pitch at all, let alone be able to change their style based on where the base umpire is positioned. If I didn't have health issues and was working top level high school varsity games, college ball or men's ASA, I don't think I'd be doing this.
|
Quote:
|
ASA tried that mechanic for Modified FP about....a long time ago- 25 years or so. Only lasted at most a couple of years.
|
Quote:
|
It is still an optional Mechanic for men's ball in NAFA
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm not surprised it is optional for NAFA as I believe that same former NUS member with ASA is now involved with NAFA. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And, as I recall, he had both hip and knee issues, and was dedicated to adopting mechanics with less physical demands. We endorse the EA suggestion that all mechanics are trade-offs, yet some mechanics aren't accepted when they benefit certain groups. Again, I don't like this one, because I don't agree with that what is lost is less important to the game. But I do support making adjustments that are advantageous, even if not "the manual" or the "DVD". |
Quote:
|
Quote:
We have all witnessed how umpires, like players, will take a stance on certain mechanics and use them regardless of the ability of the crew which s/he is a member. Once heard an umpire tell his novice partner for an JO game that he would be using his NCAA mechanics for the game because he believed moving back to ASA mechanics would throw off those used for college ball. Boys and girls, that just does not always work out well. Quote:
Quote:
|
My NCAA association tried it for a couple of years. It was dispensed of and we went back to working at A unless there is a base runner.
|
Quote:
Now as far as teaching of different mechanics is concerned, coming from The Land of the Rimming as I do, I can't comment without prejudice. Especially since our little HS school group has in it : three past or present clinicians at the NYS State school, one of whom is the author of our state manual, and another who is the NYS UIC. They all help conduct our new officials clinic, which I sometimes assist at. So I get that hammered into me ALL the time. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:38am. |