The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Search Forums

Showing results 1 to 25 of 425
Search took 0.01 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: UmpTTS43
Forum: Baseball Wed Jan 08, 2014, 07:11pm
Replies: 67
Views: 3,694
Posted By UmpTTS43
Once you answer this question then the rest falls...

Once you answer this question then the rest falls into place.

Did the advancements and/or outs occur while the improper player was a batter or a batter runner?

If the former, then advancements...
Forum: Baseball Wed Jan 08, 2014, 03:23pm
Replies: 67
Views: 3,694
Posted By UmpTTS43
Concerning OBR, this statement is 100% correct.

Concerning OBR, this statement is 100% correct.
Forum: Baseball Wed Jan 08, 2014, 03:21pm
Replies: 67
Views: 3,694
Posted By UmpTTS43
Once a pitch to an illegal batter makes him a...

Once a pitch to an illegal batter makes him a batter-runner, any and all advances as a result of that pitch are negated. If ball 4 is wild and nonforced runners advance, they must go back upon proper...
Forum: Baseball Fri Jan 03, 2014, 09:13am
Replies: 67
Views: 3,694
Posted By UmpTTS43
Being forced has nothing to do whether a runner...

Being forced has nothing to do whether a runner has to return or not. If a runner advances when the batter becomes a runner, they must return. The only time advancements stand is when they are made...
Forum: Baseball Thu Jan 02, 2014, 04:59pm
Replies: 67
Views: 3,694
Posted By UmpTTS43
In all three scenarios the runner must return...

In all three scenarios the runner must return when the BOO appeal is upheld. The advancement was made while the batter turned into a batter runner. Advancements can only be made while the illegal...
Forum: Baseball Tue Mar 05, 2013, 04:36pm
Replies: 45
Views: 3,871
Posted By UmpTTS43
Personal opinion. Bad ejection due to quick hook...

Personal opinion. Bad ejection due to quick hook and lack of game management.
Forum: Baseball Fri Feb 01, 2013, 08:36pm
Replies: 83
Views: 5,221
Posted By UmpTTS43
A - don't get what you're trying to get at. B...

A - don't get what you're trying to get at.
B - you cannot get OBS if the runner was to run the fielder over since the fielder was in the act of fielding a thrown ball.
Forum: Baseball Thu Jan 31, 2013, 10:13pm
Replies: 83
Views: 5,221
Posted By UmpTTS43
Yes but an all of the above answer means all...

Yes but an all of the above answer means all other answers are correct inclusively. This cannot be the case.
Forum: Baseball Thu Jan 31, 2013, 05:37pm
Replies: 83
Views: 5,221
Posted By UmpTTS43
Because A says he must be tagged. Another answer...

Because A says he must be tagged. Another answer says, paraphrasing, that if the fielder had possession of the ball during the tag attempt the runner would be guilty of going outside of his 3`...
Forum: Baseball Thu Jan 31, 2013, 12:09pm
Replies: 83
Views: 5,221
Posted By UmpTTS43
D - All of the above, is not a correct answer.

D - All of the above, is not a correct answer.
Forum: Baseball Tue Jan 29, 2013, 07:42pm
Replies: 87
Views: 6,231
Posted By UmpTTS43
Under rule 2.0 Interference it says "On any...

Under rule 2.0 Interference it says "On any interference the ball is dead."

You going to take this literally?

Sounds like maybe you need time with the rule book instead of in it. You are wrong...
Forum: Baseball Thu Dec 06, 2012, 06:41pm
Replies: 22
Views: 2,480
Posted By UmpTTS43
The runners lane rule was originally put in to...

The runners lane rule was originally put in to prohibit the runner from intentionally crashing into the first baseman thereby preventing a putout. At one time, this was legal. They failed to...
Forum: Baseball Wed Nov 28, 2012, 09:20pm
Replies: 15
Views: 13,063
Posted By UmpTTS43
You speak as if you know what you are talking...

You speak as if you know what you are talking about. Reality is that you have zero idea of what you are talking about.
Forum: Baseball Sat Oct 20, 2012, 02:08pm
Replies: 11
Views: 1,612
Posted By UmpTTS43
Once a fielder is no longer in the act of...

Once a fielder is no longer in the act of fielding a ball, he has an obligation to give way to the runner and not obstruct him. In the play above, he did give way immediately after the fielding...
Forum: Baseball Mon Aug 27, 2012, 04:53pm
Replies: 52
Views: 3,008
Posted By UmpTTS43
If it's not an option in this play, then it...

If it's not an option in this play, then it shouldn't be an option in this example.

R1R2 0 outs. Pop fly to F6. IFF called. R2 interferes with F6 in his attempt to field the fly while R2 is...
Forum: Baseball Mon Aug 27, 2012, 01:51pm
Replies: 52
Views: 3,008
Posted By UmpTTS43
Yes, I will give you that in an ideal world. ...

Yes, I will give you that in an ideal world. There was so much going on during this play with different judgements by different umpires concerning different aspects of the play that I see nothing...
Forum: Baseball Mon Aug 27, 2012, 12:55pm
Replies: 52
Views: 3,008
Posted By UmpTTS43
By the fielder missing the catch, it actually...

By the fielder missing the catch, it actually makes my case for protecting another fielder easier. If F2 would have made the catch, it would have been a harder sell protecting another fielder when...
Forum: Baseball Mon Aug 27, 2012, 12:48pm
Replies: 52
Views: 3,008
Posted By UmpTTS43
Concerning 1) Quit putting words in my mouth. I...

Concerning 1) Quit putting words in my mouth. I never said that they did nothing wrong. They did the right thing by keeping the ball live until the fair/foul status was determined. I do not know...
Forum: Baseball Mon Aug 27, 2012, 12:39pm
Replies: 52
Views: 3,008
Posted By UmpTTS43
Typically, but not always, F2 is the last fielder...

Typically, but not always, F2 is the last fielder protected when multiple fielders are converging on a fly ball away from the plate area.



I see nowhere where I TYPED that I was protecting F2. ...
Forum: Baseball Mon Aug 27, 2012, 12:32pm
Replies: 52
Views: 3,008
Posted By UmpTTS43
This is how I would have ruled given the IFF...

This is how I would have ruled given the IFF situation and protecting F3. Let's throw the INT out the window for the sake of this arguement as to not muddy this sitch. OBS called on F2. Ball kept...
Forum: Baseball Mon Aug 27, 2012, 12:24pm
Replies: 52
Views: 3,008
Posted By UmpTTS43
Really? And a clinic would teach me what? I know...

Really? And a clinic would teach me what? I know the rules concerning situations such as these and how to apply them. This is one of those plays that happen very rarely and makes it such that there...
Forum: Baseball Mon Aug 27, 2012, 12:04pm
Replies: 52
Views: 3,008
Posted By UmpTTS43
I don't know how you infer that. I would have...

I don't know how you infer that. I would have protected F3 hence the INT.



A] not all INT results in an immediate dead ball B] you keep the ball live until the status is determined for the...
Forum: Baseball Mon Aug 27, 2012, 11:53am
Replies: 52
Views: 3,008
Posted By UmpTTS43
We also have an IFF situation. We have to keep...

We also have an IFF situation. We have to keep it live until we know the status of the ball.
Forum: Baseball Mon Aug 27, 2012, 11:51am
Replies: 52
Views: 3,008
Posted By UmpTTS43
Obviously because it ended up being a routine...

Obviously because it ended up being a routine catch. :rolleyes:

F2 is the last fielder protected. I believe the correct call was made. I would have ruled INT as well.
Forum: Baseball Tue Aug 14, 2012, 10:39am
Replies: 29
Views: 4,967
Posted By UmpTTS43
Sometimes a CC is named in 2 man, sometimes one...

Sometimes a CC is named in 2 man, sometimes one isn't. In the event that one is not, the PU usually assumes this role. When you deal with crews larger than that, there is a CC. When this happens,...
Showing results 1 to 25 of 425

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:45pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1