The Official Forum > Search Forums Search Results

User Name Remember Me? Password

Showing results 1 to 4 of 4 Search took 0.00 seconds. Search: Posts Made By: Gee

Forum: Baseball Sat Aug 14, 2004, 10:18am

Replies: 36 Red Sox vs Devil Rays - 8/12/04 Views: 3,819 Posted By Gee Jim, I certainly see your point and it's a valid... Jim, I certainly see your point and it's a valid point in some situations that could be called incidental contact. In my opinion this wasn't one of them. The reason being is that the contact was...

Forum: Baseball Fri Aug 13, 2004, 05:25pm

Replies: 36 Red Sox vs Devil Rays - 8/12/04 Views: 3,819 Posted By Gee Jim Porter wrote: I have absolutely no doubt... Jim Porter wrote: I have absolutely no doubt in my mind that if the umpire hadn't called interference and the play was allowed to stand not another word would've been said about it by anyone --...

Forum: Baseball Fri Aug 13, 2004, 01:55pm

Replies: 36 Red Sox vs Devil Rays - 8/12/04 Views: 3,819 Posted By Gee Jim, There are several ways that a runner... Jim, There are several ways that a runner can interfere with a fielder. Some are called incidental contact, some are overlooked and others are not even considered, especially by MLU's. But when...

Forum: Baseball Fri Aug 13, 2004, 09:13am

Replies: 36 Red Sox vs Devil Rays - 8/12/04 Views: 3,819 Posted By Gee Jim. You surprise me. In this type of... Jim. You surprise me. In this type of interference there is no delayed dead ball and there is no incidental contact when the runner makes contact with the fielder when he is in the act of fielding a...

Showing results 1 to 4 of 4

Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Baseball Basketball Football Softball General / Off-Topic Hockey Lacrosse Rugby Soccer Swimming/Diving Track & Field Volleyball Wrestling Feedback Testing Forum