The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Search Forums
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Showing results 1 to 4 of 4
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: Jimgolf
Forum: Basketball Wed Oct 18, 2006, 10:43am
Replies: 51
Views: 5,108
Posted By Jimgolf
The assumption was that the contact would be...

The assumption was that the contact would be sufficient to call a foul. I guess I can be confusing too. But I'm not being paid to write this stuff.

For those who think the words in the...
Forum: Basketball Tue Oct 17, 2006, 12:11pm
Replies: 51
Views: 5,108
Posted By Jimgolf
I understand what each of you are saying. ...

I understand what each of you are saying. However, it is clear that the FED ruling is confusing at best.

A player setting a screen is most defintely involved in the play. No possible...
Forum: Basketball Tue Oct 17, 2006, 09:26am
Replies: 51
Views: 5,108
Posted By Jimgolf
????? The wording means fouling a player...

?????

The wording means fouling a player that is not setting a screen and not attempting to receive the in-bounds pass and not etc. must be deemed intentional.

Conversely fouling a player that...
Forum: Basketball Tue Oct 17, 2006, 09:08am
Replies: 51
Views: 5,108
Posted By Jimgolf
I don't think so. It means fouling a player who...

I don't think so. It means fouling a player who is doing nothing must be called intentional. Fouling a player setting a screen is not a mandatory intentional foul, according to this statement.
...
Showing results 1 to 4 of 4

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:37am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1