Forum: Baseball
Thu Sep 06, 2007, 01:01am
|
Replies: 70
Views: 5,149
|
Forum: Baseball
Wed Sep 05, 2007, 09:20pm
|
Replies: 70
Views: 5,149
Doesn't have to be blatant, blatant buys you a...
Doesn't have to be blatant, blatant buys you a reason that is supported by a very public event.
This is the theory of the "non call", there are bunches of them, things that are rules violatins...
|
Forum: Baseball
Wed Sep 05, 2007, 09:12pm
|
Replies: 70
Views: 5,149
Sure you can. Who says that D is limited to...
Sure you can. Who says that D is limited to throwing anywhere at anytime regardless of whether R1 is allowed R2. Haven't you seen F2 throw to 1b on a walk in hopes that BR makes the wrong turn or...
|
Forum: Baseball
Wed Sep 05, 2007, 09:01pm
|
Replies: 70
Views: 5,149
Originally Posted by fitump56
Assuming that...
Originally Posted by fitump56
Assuming that that Ball Four was called after the B interfered, which is what I take from "the batter leans over the outside part over the plate but does not swing. the...
|
Forum: Baseball
Tue Sep 04, 2007, 12:42am
|
Replies: 70
Views: 5,149
Not if you have B INT not B-R INT
No...
Not if you have B INT not B-R INT
No difference, either you have a "B" or a B-R, depends on the timig of the call Ball Four. Which brings up the very good point of "see them, call them,...
|
Forum: Baseball
Tue Sep 04, 2007, 12:37am
|
Replies: 70
Views: 5,149
|