Forum: Football
Fri Aug 14, 2009, 04:31pm
|
Replies: 207
Views: 25,469
|
Forum: Football
Fri Aug 14, 2009, 03:59pm
|
Replies: 207
Views: 25,469
|
Forum: Football
Fri Aug 14, 2009, 03:47pm
|
Replies: 207
Views: 25,469
|
Forum: Football
Fri Aug 14, 2009, 12:02pm
|
Replies: 207
Views: 25,469
One last trip down the rabbit hole...
For...
One last trip down the rabbit hole...
For your reading enjoyment:
2-37 Rule:
A rule is one of the groups of regulations which govern the game. A rule
sometimes states what a player may do,...
|
Forum: Football
Fri Aug 14, 2009, 11:36am
|
Replies: 207
Views: 25,469
|
Forum: Football
Thu Aug 13, 2009, 08:24pm
|
Replies: 207
Views: 25,469
|
Forum: Football
Fri Aug 07, 2009, 04:55pm
|
Replies: 207
Views: 25,469
|
Forum: Football
Thu Aug 06, 2009, 10:42pm
|
Replies: 207
Views: 25,469
I don't understand you. You ask for logic,...
I don't understand you. You ask for logic, reasonings, etc to support the interpretation and then you reject them with vague terms, relying on your supposed common sense but you don't offer any real...
|
Forum: Football
Thu Aug 06, 2009, 07:36pm
|
Replies: 207
Views: 25,469
Not quite. The reading of the very definition...
Not quite. The reading of the very definition does not lend OOB to being a persistent state but rather a volatile state that exists only as long as a specific condition is being met.
Why are you...
|
Forum: Football
Thu Aug 06, 2009, 05:41pm
|
Replies: 207
Views: 25,469
Here is the other point of contention. The...
Here is the other point of contention. The current Redding Guide case play goes into more detail than the 2003 CB play did. I am focusing more on the airborne player being out of bounds or not...
|
Forum: Football
Thu Aug 06, 2009, 05:39pm
|
Replies: 207
Views: 25,469
|
Forum: Football
Thu Aug 06, 2009, 05:37pm
|
Replies: 207
Views: 25,469
|
Forum: Football
Thu Aug 06, 2009, 03:42pm
|
Replies: 207
Views: 25,469
|
Forum: Football
Thu Aug 06, 2009, 03:34pm
|
Replies: 207
Views: 25,469
Well there was an NF casebook play up through...
Well there was an NF casebook play up through 2003 that said an airborne player previously touching out of bounds was not out of bounds. There has been no rule change, editorial change or retraction...
|
Forum: Football
Fri Jul 31, 2009, 07:02pm
|
Replies: 207
Views: 25,469
|
Forum: Football
Fri Jul 31, 2009, 04:35pm
|
Replies: 207
Views: 25,469
|
Forum: Football
Tue Jul 28, 2009, 01:28pm
|
Replies: 207
Views: 25,469
|
Forum: Football
Mon Jul 27, 2009, 05:38pm
|
Replies: 207
Views: 25,469
No, they wouldn't be guilty of IP because they...
No, they wouldn't be guilty of IP because they are non-players and they did not participate in the play. This is not the same as a player leaving and entering the field again during a play.
This,...
|
Forum: Football
Sat Apr 11, 2009, 04:43pm
|
Replies: 207
Views: 25,469
The first post in this thread contains the...
The first post in this thread contains the Redding play and interpretation that supports this.
As far as the actual wording of the rule is concerned, I don't know how "touching" can be any simpler...
|
Forum: Football
Sat Apr 11, 2009, 11:30am
|
Replies: 207
Views: 25,469
|
Forum: Football
Fri Apr 10, 2009, 04:08pm
|
Replies: 207
Views: 25,469
I think we ned to bring in the Bob M....
I think we ned to bring in the Bob M. interpretation on the matter. :D
I do not personally see how the Rule 2 definition of being out of bounds can be interpreted in any matter other than by black...
|