The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Search Forums
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Showing results 1 to 6 of 6
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: jcoopv
Forum: Football Wed Sep 14, 2005, 08:59am
Replies: 21
Views: 2,628
Posted By jcoopv
just the answers

here are what I have for the answers. I look forward in dicussing them if yall care to.

2005 Approved and Certified Part II

1 F 51 F
2 F 52 T
3 F 53 F
4 F 54 T
5 T 55 T
6 F 56 T
Forum: Football Wed Sep 14, 2005, 07:40am
Replies: 21
Views: 2,628
Posted By jcoopv
NCAA

Patton,

The ruling is the same in NCAA, as per AR 6-3-V, on page FI-25, it results in a safety.
Forum: Football Tue Sep 13, 2005, 03:37pm
Replies: 21
Views: 2,628
Posted By jcoopv
re again part ii

3. But you cannot add a new force to a kick in flight by muffing or batting, Rule 2-13-3. Therefore K has recovered a kick that K was responsible for putting in the endzone, thus a safety.
Forum: Football Tue Sep 13, 2005, 03:06pm
Replies: 21
Views: 2,628
Posted By jcoopv
re again

1. The number exception does apply but it only applies to allow playes numbered 1-49 or 80-99 to be counted as one of the 5 linemen, but it does not allow for numbers 50-79 to become elligible...
Forum: Football Tue Sep 13, 2005, 01:10pm
Replies: 21
Views: 2,628
Posted By jcoopv
re

1. False 52 is not eligible unless B touches the ball.
3. True all punts entering R's endzone are Touchbacks
7. false a replaced player cannot reenter during the same play.
10. false Fair catch...
Forum: Football Wed Oct 02, 2002, 08:28am
Replies: 2
Views: 1,181
Posted By jcoopv
Post Here in GA we recently took the Part II Test. ...

Here in GA we recently took the Part II Test. This years test was somewhat different from the past test I have taken. This one was written by someone in the state office and it was not a very well...
Showing results 1 to 6 of 6

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1