Hit on Bengals punter

[Ref inSoCA]

There is no logic. Blandino is not an official and, apparently, knows nothing about officiating. The worst Commissioner is all of sports has made the NFL a joke.

That was a geat block that cleared a hole for the runner. If the punter is such a pussy, he shouldn't be out there.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Ref inSoCA

There is no logic. Blandino is not an official and, apparently, knows nothing about officiating. The worst Commissioner is all of sports has made the NFL a joke.

That was a geat block that cleared a hole for the runner. If the punter is such a pussy, he shouldn't be out there.

Is this a rules based in interpretation or your own personal thoughts?

[ajmc]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Is this a rules based in interpretation or your own personal thoughts?

Apparently that was an interpretation shared by the field officials on the game.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by ajmc

Apparently that was an interpretation shared by the field officials on the game.

But not their bosses.

[APG]

Originally Posted by Ref inSoCA

There is no logic. Blandino is not an official and, apparently, knows nothing about officiating. The worst Commissioner is all of sports has made the NFL a joke.

That was a geat block that cleared a hole for the runner. If the punter is such a pussy, he shouldn't be out there.

There is a clear logic behind the rule...of which everyone else seems to be able to understand except for you and hbk213.

So I assume that you think the NCAA is a joke as well? Because the punter would be afforded the exact same protections on this play as the NFL.

[hbk314]

Originally Posted by APG

There is a clear logic behind the rule...of which everyone else seems to be able to understand except for you and hbk213.

So I assume that you think the NCAA is a joke as well? Because the punter would be afforded the exact same protections on this play as the NFL.

I understand it. What would you think of making the punters or any other player afforded defenseless player protection for the duration of plays wear some kind of identifier, whether a different jersey color or something else?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by hbk314

I understand it. What would you think of making the punters or any other player afforded defenseless player protection for the duration of plays wear some kind of identifier, whether a different jersey color or something else?

A unique number seems to be sufficient for the vast majority of plays.

[hbk314]

Originally Posted by Adam

A unique number seems to be sufficient for the vast majority of plays.

Receivers and punters/kickers/quarterbacks do have some overlap in numbering.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by hbk314

Receivers and punters/kickers/quarterbacks do have some overlap in numbering.

Yes and no. At that level, everyone knows who the punter is, and what his number is. They spent hours watching film all week. There are no secrets.

Originally Posted by Adam

Yes and no. At that level, everyone knows who the punter is, and what his number is. They spent hours watching film all week. There are no secrets.

I think he's just saying if protecting the punter is so important why not make it really clear who he is. I can imagine that a player might block a punter or kicker without happening to glance at his number. If protecting those guys is so important it makes sense to give them a special jersey color.

[APG]

Originally Posted by hbk314

I understand it. What would you think of making the punters or any other player afforded defenseless player protection for the duration of plays wear some kind of identifier, whether a different jersey color or something else?

Don't really think it's needed...it's pretty evident to everyone on the field who the kicker/punter or QB is on a play.