|
Mon Nov 11, 2013, 10:06am
|
|||
|
|||
|
To those late in the thread that would not call this illegal because they can't hear, and thus think there may not be any verbal cues... this is EXACTLY why they changed the rule from just verbal to 'actions or verbal'. I do agree that if someone was shouting, "snap it now", that might make it different... but it seems blatantly clear to me (and honestly, it worries me that it's not obvious to you) that this was a DESIGNED event intended to make the defense not believe a snap was imminent. I mean - they all look to the side, and only one player takes off at the snap. How could this not be designed to make the defense fall asleep. This play is the very definition of this rule.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike 
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://forum.officiating.com/football/96367-sleeper-play.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| Anyone gonna try this one? | CoachHuey.com | This thread | Refback | Sat Oct 26, 2013 03:12pm | |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NHSF "intentional" vs NCAA "flagarent" terminology | Duffman | Basketball | 17 | Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:15pm |
| Is "the patient whistle" and "possession consequence" ruining the game? | fiasco | Basketball | 46 | Fri Dec 02, 2011 08:43am |
| ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight | pizanno | Basketball | 27 | Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am |
| "serious" foul by offended team during their advantage play | Robert Goodman | Rugby | 4 | Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:21pm |
Threaded Mode
